2018 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/embc.2018.8513660
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the generalizability of ECG-based obstructive sleep apnea monitoring: merits and limitations of the Apnea-ECG database

Abstract: Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is a sleep disorder that affects a large part of the population and the development of algorithms using cardiovascular features for OSAS monitoring has been an extensively researched topic in the last two decades. Several studies regarding automatic apneic event classification using ECG derived features are based on the public Apnea-ECG database available on PhysioNet. Although this database is an excellent starting point for apnea topic investigations, in our study we s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This data set is rather easy to classify, since the control subjects are volunteers instead of patients with sleep related complaints (Penzel et al, 2000). When algorithms trained on the Apnea-ECG data set are tested on clinical data with more complex disease patterns, drops in accuracy of up to 15 % can be seen (Papini et al, 2018). Therefore, only a direct comparison to the algorithm by Varon et al (Varon et al, 2015a) was included, since this clinical data set, OSA Varon, was available for this study.…”
Section: Apnea Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This data set is rather easy to classify, since the control subjects are volunteers instead of patients with sleep related complaints (Penzel et al, 2000). When algorithms trained on the Apnea-ECG data set are tested on clinical data with more complex disease patterns, drops in accuracy of up to 15 % can be seen (Papini et al, 2018). Therefore, only a direct comparison to the algorithm by Varon et al (Varon et al, 2015a) was included, since this clinical data set, OSA Varon, was available for this study.…”
Section: Apnea Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characteristics used in previous studies are relatively many and varied. Some features measure signal statistics [14] and features that capture the heart rate variability of ECG signals [12,25]. It is different from the proposed method, where only one feature is measured (sample entropy) but is carried out at various signal scales.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several alternate apnea detection methods with noninvasive sensing either have inconsistent performance on large cohorts [7] or focus only on desaturation-associated events [9], thereby severely underestimating apnea episode count and duration. Further, most works directly estimate AHI, which does not account for apnea duration that is found to be strongly linked to mortality [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ECG has been widely studied for sleep apnea screening with publicly available Physionet 2000 dataset [6]. However, the algorithms requiring robust ECG processing are not generalizable to other ECG datasets [7]. SpO2 and photoplethysmogram (PPG) waveform derived pulse rate variability (PRV) are shown to provide good performance for apnea detection [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%