2013
DOI: 10.2991/jsta.2013.12.1.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Generalized Hill Process for Small Parameters and Applications

Abstract: Let X 1 , X 2 , ... be a sequence of independent copies (s.i.c) of a real random variable (r.v.) X ≥ 1, with distribution function df F (x) = P(X ≤ x) and let X 1,n ≤ X 2,n ≤ ... ≤ X n,n be the order statistics based on the n ≥ 1 first of these observations. The following continuous generalized Hill processτ > 0, 1 ≤ k ≤ n, has been introduced as a continuous family of estimators of the extreme value index, and largely studied for statistical purposes with asymptotic normality results restricted to τ > 1/2. We… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the statistics in and are kernel EVI estimators, of the type , built with the power ( scriptP) and log ( scriptL) kernel functions, scriptPfalse(wfalse)scriptPfalse(ω,ufalse):=ω0.1emuω1,1emand1emscriptLfalse(wfalse)scriptLfalse(ω,ufalse):=1normalΓfalse(ωfalse)false(lnufalse)ω1,1em0<u<1, respectively, where ω is a tuning parameter and Γ denotes the complete Gamma function, defined by normalΓfalse(tfalse)=0xt1ex0.1emdx, t >0. Also, the class of estimators in was studied in Gomes and Martins and Gomes et al for any real ω ≥ 1 and in Diop and Lo, Lo et al, and Caeiro et al for any real parameter ω >0. Ratios of differences of the statistics in with ω ≥ 1 were considered in Goegebeur et al and Caeiro and Gomes to estimate high‐order tail parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Indeed, the statistics in and are kernel EVI estimators, of the type , built with the power ( scriptP) and log ( scriptL) kernel functions, scriptPfalse(wfalse)scriptPfalse(ω,ufalse):=ω0.1emuω1,1emand1emscriptLfalse(wfalse)scriptLfalse(ω,ufalse):=1normalΓfalse(ωfalse)false(lnufalse)ω1,1em0<u<1, respectively, where ω is a tuning parameter and Γ denotes the complete Gamma function, defined by normalΓfalse(tfalse)=0xt1ex0.1emdx, t >0. Also, the class of estimators in was studied in Gomes and Martins and Gomes et al for any real ω ≥ 1 and in Diop and Lo, Lo et al, and Caeiro et al for any real parameter ω >0. Ratios of differences of the statistics in with ω ≥ 1 were considered in Goegebeur et al and Caeiro and Gomes to estimate high‐order tail parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…respectively, where is a tuning parameter and Γ denotes the complete Gamma function, defined by Γ(t) = ∫ ∞ 0 x t−1 e −x dx, t > 0. Also, the class of estimators in (5) was studied in Gomes and Martins 15 and Gomes et al 16 for any real ≥ 1 and in Diop and Lo, 17 Lo et al, 18 and Caeiro et al 19 for any real parameter > 0. Ratios of differences of the statistics in (5) with ≥ 1 were considered in Goegebeur et al 14 and Caeiro and Gomes 20 to estimate high-order tail parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation