1994
DOI: 10.4310/jdg/1214454877
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the geometry of analytic discs attached to real manifolds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We were unable to find an analogue of this phenomenon in our case of complex dimension 2. In higher dimension no such analogue is possible due to an example by Ivashkovich and Rosay [4], in which all Bishop discs through a fixed point of a hypersurface E lie in E and cover all of E. Baouendi, Rothschild, and Trépreau [1] interpret the defect of a disc in terms of its lifts attached to the conormal bundle of E in the cotangent bundle T * I C n . Although an almost complex structure admits natural lifts to the cotangent bundle of an almost complex manifold (see, e.g., [13]), seemingly, they don't give rise to a correct notion of the defect of Bishop discs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We were unable to find an analogue of this phenomenon in our case of complex dimension 2. In higher dimension no such analogue is possible due to an example by Ivashkovich and Rosay [4], in which all Bishop discs through a fixed point of a hypersurface E lie in E and cover all of E. Baouendi, Rothschild, and Trépreau [1] interpret the defect of a disc in terms of its lifts attached to the conormal bundle of E in the cotangent bundle T * I C n . Although an almost complex structure admits natural lifts to the cotangent bundle of an almost complex manifold (see, e.g., [13]), seemingly, they don't give rise to a correct notion of the defect of Bishop discs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baouendi, Rothschild, and Trépreau [2] interpret the defect of a disc in terms of its lifts to the conormal bundle of E in the cotangent bundle T * I C n . Although an almost complex structure admits natural lifts to the cotangent bundle of an almost complex manifold (see, e.g., [16]), obviously, they don't give rise to the correct notions of the defect of Bishop discs.…”
Section: Bishop Discs and The Bishop Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By applying Tumanov's theorem again to the open subset M 0 ⊂ M, we obtain another (standard) wedge W 2 with edge M 0 at 0, where all CR-functions on M 0 holomorphically extend. We shall need more precise information about the wedge W 2 that can be obtained from the theory of defects of analytic discs [Tu88] (see also the geometric definition due to Baouendi-RothschildTrépreau [BRT94] that has been used in [Tu96]). Here the C 2,α -smoothness of M 0 is required to guarantee the C 1,α -smoothness of the conormal bundle to M 0 needed for Bishop's equation.…”
Section: Holomorphic Extension Of Functions On Wedges; Proof Of Theormentioning
confidence: 99%