2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfa.2021.109173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Hölder regularity of signed solutions to a doubly nonlinear equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…N.Liao in [30] has effected a direct proof of Hölder regularity for parabolic p-Laplace equation by using the expansion of positivity. It has also been used to give the first proofs of Hölder regularity for signchanging solutions of doubly nonlinear equations of porous medium type in [4,9,31].…”
Section: Rnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…N.Liao in [30] has effected a direct proof of Hölder regularity for parabolic p-Laplace equation by using the expansion of positivity. It has also been used to give the first proofs of Hölder regularity for signchanging solutions of doubly nonlinear equations of porous medium type in [4,9,31].…”
Section: Rnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The condition requires some changes in the classical proof for the prototype porous medium equation u t = ∆u m in [7]. It is more general than what we would need in view of the application to the biofilm model (2) we have in mind.…”
Section: Assumptions and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…we recognize that the first equation of ( 2) is a particular case of (1). In (2) the actual biofilm is the subregion of Ω where M is positive, that is,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it seems that a complete picture about the long-time behaviour of solutions to (1.2) is still missing, in the case of sign-changing solutions and for more general boundary data. We refer to [6,Section 1.3] and the references therein, for a discussion on the physical relevance of equation (1.2). 1 We notice that [40] deals with the (apparently) different equation…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%