2010
DOI: 10.1002/pi.2934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the hydrodynamic analysis of conformation in mixed biopolymer systems

Abstract: A brief review is given of some of the advances in hydrodynamic methodologies for studying the conformation and flexibility of biomacromolecules in mixed systems. We consider first of all evaluation of conformation type and flexibility in polymer systems with a quasi-continuous distribution of molecular weight -using polysaccharides and mucin glycoproteins as our main examples, and then conformation determination in discrete or paucidisperse systems such as aggregated antibody preparations. This paper is based… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relationship of M w with radius of gyration ( R g ) was established using linear regression, and the slope of R g - M w could represent the chain conformation of polymers. The slope of rigid chain in solvent is higher than 1.0, and the values of 0.33 and 0.5–0.6 represent the conformation of sphere chain and random coil, respectively [ 36 ]. The conformation plot slopes of KSP-30E and NSP-30E ( Figure 3 C) were 1.10 and 1.15, indicating the rigid chain conformation of these polysaccharides [ 37 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship of M w with radius of gyration ( R g ) was established using linear regression, and the slope of R g - M w could represent the chain conformation of polymers. The slope of rigid chain in solvent is higher than 1.0, and the values of 0.33 and 0.5–0.6 represent the conformation of sphere chain and random coil, respectively [ 36 ]. The conformation plot slopes of KSP-30E and NSP-30E ( Figure 3 C) were 1.10 and 1.15, indicating the rigid chain conformation of these polysaccharides [ 37 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular weight (molar mass) and molar mass distribution have been documented as being the most important physical parameters affecting the immunogenicity of capsular polysaccharides 24 25 . While many other aspects of polysaccharide characterisation have been relatively thoroughly explored 26 27 28 , the physical characterisation of capsular polysaccharides (molecular size and mass distribution and conformational flexibility) has been less extensively pursued. Such physical studies for capsular polysaccharides have been generally limited to low pressure chromatographic analyses calibrated with “standards” and more recently to high performance size exclusion chromatography (SEC) coupled to on-line refractive index detector (RI), multi-angle light scattering (MALS).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, GBP was found to be a linear polymer exhibiting a random coil conformation, demonstrated by a Mark–Houwink–Sakurada α value of 0.702. This interpretation is based on the accepted values of α for polymers, wherein the α value of 0.5–0.8 represents a malleable random coil conformation, a α value greater than 0.8 denotes semimalleable or extra stretched chains [ 45 ], a α value of 0 indicates rigid sphere, one of 2 demonstrates stiff rod, and one of ~0.7 specifies a linear conformation [ 46 ]. The linear structure of GBP was also evident from the Rg/Rh value (1.57), where this ratio was ~0.775 for globular polymers, and a higher value demonstrated a correspondingly greater deviation from an orbicular to a more linearly stretched conformation [ 47 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%