2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.03.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the identification of representative in situ soil moisture monitoring stations for the validation of SMAP soil moisture products in Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such complexity will likely result in relatively low agreement between the in situ soil moisture observations (which are dominated by local hydrological processes) and the remotely sensed product that represent the average conditions over a very large area. It should be noted that specific approaches exist for determining whether point scale observations have the capacity to represent large areas [30]. However, it was decided to use all stations that satisfied the described selection criteria, since an evaluation over the widest possible range of climate conditions is required, as the quality of the remotely sensed products is known to vary accordingly [7,9,10,27].…”
Section: In Situ Soil Moisture Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such complexity will likely result in relatively low agreement between the in situ soil moisture observations (which are dominated by local hydrological processes) and the remotely sensed product that represent the average conditions over a very large area. It should be noted that specific approaches exist for determining whether point scale observations have the capacity to represent large areas [30]. However, it was decided to use all stations that satisfied the described selection criteria, since an evaluation over the widest possible range of climate conditions is required, as the quality of the remotely sensed products is known to vary accordingly [7,9,10,27].…”
Section: In Situ Soil Moisture Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several algorithms are available for soil moisture retrievals using passive microwave instruments, including the single-channel algorithm [Jackson, 1993;Jackson et al, 1994Jackson et al, , 1996, the multifrequency-polarization iterative algorithm [Njoku and Li, 1999;Njoku et al, 2003;Koike et al, 2000], the look-up table algorithm [Fujii et al, 2009], the polarization index algorithm [Paloscia et al, 2001], and the Dual-Channel Algorithm based on the Qp model (QDCA) [Shi et al, 2005[Shi et al, , 2006. Recently, with these algorithms considerable satellite soil moisture validation work has been conducted in the United States [Collow et al, 2012;Leroux et al, 2013;Ford et al, 2014;Kornelsen et al, 2015;Kim et al, 2015;Chan et al, 2016;Zhang et al, 2017] [Panciera et al, 2009;Draper et al, 2009;Su et al, 2014;Kim et al, 2015;O'Neill et al, 2016;Yee et al, 2016;Cho et al, 2017], and the Tibetan Plateau, China [Su et al, 2011[Su et al, , 2013Liu et al, 2013;Chen et al, 2013;Bi et al, 2016]. However, limited comparative work has been performed in northeast China.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TStab exhibits the largest disagreements with respect to the other methods. In agricultural sites, human decisions (cropping and irrigation) undermine TStab performances because they affect the temporal stability of the spatial distribution of SM (Yee et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temporal stability analysis (Vachaud et al, ) selects the station that exhibits the smallest difference, in terms of mean and dispersion (Cosh et al, , ; Kornelsen & Coulibaly, ). It is based on the assumption that spatial SM fields are stable in time, which is not always true (Yee et al, ). Triple collocation (TC) can also be used to estimate the representativeness of ground stations (Chen et al, ; Gruber et al, ; Miralles et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%