2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2006.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the identity and reactivity patterns of the “second oxidant” of the T252A mutant of cytochrome P450cam in the oxidation of 5-methylenenylcamphor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…48 We can tentatively deduce that were Cpd 0 the reactive species in the T252A mutant of CYP101, one would have expected to find alongside the epoxide of 2 also some of the corresponding 1,2-diol. This latter step involves significant electronic reorganization (C-H bond breaking, Fe=O bond breaking, C-O bond formation, and electron shift from the organic moiety to convert the Fe(IV) to Fe(III)), and therefore the corresponding barrier is large, ca.…”
Section: A Computational Assessment Of the Reactivity Of Cpd 0 Via Inmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…48 We can tentatively deduce that were Cpd 0 the reactive species in the T252A mutant of CYP101, one would have expected to find alongside the epoxide of 2 also some of the corresponding 1,2-diol. This latter step involves significant electronic reorganization (C-H bond breaking, Fe=O bond breaking, C-O bond formation, and electron shift from the organic moiety to convert the Fe(IV) to Fe(III)), and therefore the corresponding barrier is large, ca.…”
Section: A Computational Assessment Of the Reactivity Of Cpd 0 Via Inmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…1). 48 A process of reasoning that is often used in mechanistic research is based on the comparison of reactivities in model bimolecular reactions to those of P450. 31 Apparently, the two experiments are at odds with each other, and one may wonder if the photo-oxidative experiment indeed gave rise to Cpd I.…”
Section: Sason Shaik Hajime Hirao Devesh Kumarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electronic structure of Cpd I and the electron reorganization patterns of the substrate oxidation reactions of Cpd I have been discussed for several different spin states (Ogliaro et al, 2000a,b; Yoshizawa et al, 2001; de Visser et al, 2002; Himo and Siegbahn, 2003; Kamachi and Yoshizawa, 2003; Meunier et al, 2004; Hackett et al, 2005, 2007; Hirao et al, 2005; Shaik et al, 2005, 2007a,b, 2010a; Isobe et al, 2008, 2011, 2012; Shoji et al, 2008; Yamaguchi et al, 2009; Li et al, 2012; Rydberg et al, 2014). Computational studies to assess the reactivity of Cpd 0 have also been conducted (Ogliaro et al, 2002; Kamachi et al, 2003; Bach and Dmitrenko, 2006; Derat et al, 2006; Hirao et al, 2006b; Li et al, 2007). Overall, DFT calculations predicted that Cpd 0 is less reactive than Cpd I.…”
Section: Applications Of Dftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transition-state (TS) geometries at the B3 LYP/B1 level were initially optimized with Jaguar, and then located with Gaussian 03. We use this practice [36] since Gaussian has a more efficient frequency calculation module and gives more reliable energy values for TSs in some cases. The B3 LYP/B1 geometry optimization was followed by frequency calculations by Gaussian 03 at the same level to characterize local minima and TSs.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%