Handbook of Spectrum Auction Design
DOI: 10.1017/9781316471609.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Impact of Package Selection in Combinatorial Auctions: An Experimental Study in the Context of Spectrum Auction Design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, in another set of simulation experiments, Dunford et al () observed very high AE (above 95%) for Nucleolus‐based auction designs. In another set of laboratory experiments on an iterative combinatorial auction, Scheffel et al () found high AE (above 90%) and low‐profit extraction rates (less than 20%). For single‐shot combinatorial auctions, Goeree et al () observed AE levels higher than 90% in their laboratory experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Similarly, in another set of simulation experiments, Dunford et al () observed very high AE (above 95%) for Nucleolus‐based auction designs. In another set of laboratory experiments on an iterative combinatorial auction, Scheffel et al () found high AE (above 90%) and low‐profit extraction rates (less than 20%). For single‐shot combinatorial auctions, Goeree et al () observed AE levels higher than 90% in their laboratory experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This has a negative impact on revenues. Furthermore, Scheffel et al (2012), report on laboratory experiments comparing the Combinatorial Clock auction, the Hierarchical Package Bidding format, and an auction format with pseudo dual prices in large value models with 18 items. They found the limited number of packages that bidders evaluate to be the greatest barrier to efficiency, much more so than differences in the auction formats.…”
Section: Truthful Biddingmentioning
confidence: 99%