2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2016.02.103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the influence of monochromator thermal deformations on X-ray focusing

Abstract: A cooled double crystal monochromator system is used on many high heat load X-ray synchrotron radiation beamlines in order to select, by diffraction, a narrow spectrum of the beam. The wavelength of the diffracted beam is tuned by changing the angle of incidence, per the Bragg equation. Thermal deformation of the first crystal monochromatorand the potential loss of beam brillianceis often a main concern. However, if downstream beam focusing is planned, the lensing effect of the monochromator must be considered… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9) in the Fresnel region indicated an apparent source distance larger than the actual distance. All of these effects are consistent with aberrations in the monochromator (Antimonov et al, 2016) arising from thermal or mounting strains of the crystals. Further work will be needed to understand and potentially improve the monochromator performance to deliver the full brightness and coherent flux.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9) in the Fresnel region indicated an apparent source distance larger than the actual distance. All of these effects are consistent with aberrations in the monochromator (Antimonov et al, 2016) arising from thermal or mounting strains of the crystals. Further work will be needed to understand and potentially improve the monochromator performance to deliver the full brightness and coherent flux.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…While the vertical beam size matches the calculation at 12.0 keV, it becomes successively smaller at higher energies. One possible contribution to this effect would be an overall curvature of the monochromator crystals, which can act to focus or defocus the beam (Antimonov et al, 2016). The observed reduction in beam size at 25.75 keV would require a change in angle of 20 µrad across the vertical beam profile.…”
Section: Summary Of Divergence and Emittance Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al vertically focused a 7.35 keV X-ray beam in 8-ID-I using the same geometry with Be lenses with R = 0.2 mm using N = 10 instead of N = 7, the best choice from optical constants and equation 11 (Zhang et al, 2016). Calculations of this effect have been discussed recently (Antimonov et al, 2016). Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is another valuable function of reducing the whitebeam slit opening in conditions where the optics cannot preserve the brightness of the source due to spatial strain induced by the absorbed power density on the surface of the optics (Antimonov et al, 2016). We reduced the total power on the first Ge(111) crystal of the double-crystal monochromator in 8-ID-I by a factor of seven with the smaller slit and were able to produce a diffraction-limited spot in the horizontal direction, and a much improved vertical focus on 8-ID-I.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Right: thermal strain relative to 97 K (or P = 0). (Zhang et al, 2013;Antimonov et al, 2016). Power scenarios, calculated using the SPECTRA code (Tanaka & Kitamura, 2001), are summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Measurement Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%