2020
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2019.01.0048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Inherent Variability of Particulate Matter Concentrations on Small Scales and the Consequences for Miniaturized Particle Sensors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At our sampling time of t s = 9.5 min and an air flow rate of Q = 0.3 mL/min, we have a sample volume of vs. ~3 mL, which at the measured concentration of 10 µg/m 3 corresponds to a total particle mass in the sample of ~30 pg. In agreement with our finding, a 10% uncertainty can be expected at a total sample mass of 30 pg according to model calculations for PM 1 [ 30 ].…”
Section: Microfluidic Channel-based Mobility-selective Particle Sizersupporting
confidence: 91%
“…At our sampling time of t s = 9.5 min and an air flow rate of Q = 0.3 mL/min, we have a sample volume of vs. ~3 mL, which at the measured concentration of 10 µg/m 3 corresponds to a total particle mass in the sample of ~30 pg. In agreement with our finding, a 10% uncertainty can be expected at a total sample mass of 30 pg according to model calculations for PM 1 [ 30 ].…”
Section: Microfluidic Channel-based Mobility-selective Particle Sizersupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Within the sampling time of 10 min, an average deviation of 24.9 ± 5.3% relative to the 'true values' measured by FMPS was observed at an average uncertainty of 2.3 ± 0.1 µg/m 3 . A much smaller deviation (7.2 ± 1.9%) was achieved in a period of 1 h-3.3 h. Large error contributions were found for the measured values within the first 40 min and at the last 2.7 h. This may have been caused by fluctuations of ambient conditions (T, rH, particle size distribution) around the cantilever [37,38]. In the previous work [24], we found a resonance frequency decrease of a bare EtPCS of up to~11 Hz upon an increase of both temperature (~2 K) and rH (~14%).…”
Section: Etpcs Cantilever Performancementioning
confidence: 83%
“… The study is equally applicable and quite of highly enhancing also for the study like [40] and scale-based barriers must be always in great concern like [41].  The study could vary or modify available practices of greenery in and along road-side pollution concern as studied for [42] and [43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%