On the Institutionalization of Congress(Es) in Latin America and Beyond

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Inter-American Development Bank, its Board of Directors, or the countries they represent. Terms of use: Documents inThe unauthorized commercial use of Bank documents is prohibited and may be punishable under the Bank's policies and/or applicable laws. Copyright ©Inter-American Development Bank. This working paper may be reproduced for any non-commercial purpose. It may also be reproduced in any academic journal indexed by the American Economic Association's EconLit, with previous consent by the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), provided that the IDB is credited and that the author(s) receive no income from the publication. Cataloging-in-Publication AbstractThis paper proposes an agenda for the study of the determinants and the processes by which strong policymaking institutions emerge, with emphasis on the most central democratic institution: the legislature. It reviews extant theories of institutionalization, and proposes further ways of specifying and studying the concept. It emphasizes the notion that investments and beliefs are the driving force of Congress institutionalization and of its relevance in the policymaking process. Making use of several indicators of Congress institutionalization, it provides evidence suggesting that Congress institutionalization has an impact on the qualities of public policies and on economic and social development outcomes. It also explores some "constitutional" factors that may promote Congress institutionalization. Given that a central theoretical argument of this paper is that the institutionalization of legislatures is a process that includes various self-reinforcing dynamics, the paper also undertakes the preliminary steps in developing a comparative case study of the evolution of Congress institutionalization in two Latin American countries: Argentina and Chile.JEL Codes: D70, D72, H0

The Politics of Federalism in Argentina: Implications for Governance and Accountability

“…45 Studies have shown, for instance, that Argentine legislators are among those with lower levels of education in Latin America (Saiegh, 2010;Inter-American Development Bank 2006). In addition, Argentine legislators tend to have short stays in Congress and tend not to specialize in legislative committees (Palanza et al, 2012). All of these patterns reflect the fact that the Argentine Congress is an arena of secondary importance in the making of national policies.…”

Congressional Institutionalization: A Cross‐National Comparison

“…We do so to highlight the relevance of these notions and measures of institutionalization. Table 2 provides a synthetic summary of some exercises, described in more detail in Palanza, Scartascini, and Tommasi (2012).…”

“… There is evidence in that regard in a comparison between the Argentine and Chilean congresses in Palanza, Scartascini, and Tommasi ().…”

Legislative Effort and Career Paths in the Argentine Congress

“…7 It is worth clarifying f or U.S. readers that in Argentina a law degree is attained at the "college" level. There are few Argentine legislators with graduate studies (Palanza, Scartascini and Tommasi, 2012).…”