2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00229-015-0747-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the interior motive of certain Shimura varieties: the case of Picard surfaces

Abstract: The purpose of this article is to construct a Hecke-equivariant Chow motive whose realizations equal interior (or intersection) cohomology of Picard surfaces with regular algebraic coefficients. As a consequence, we are able to define Grothendieck motives for Picard modular forms.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8.6] is induced by an irreducible representation of G, whose highest weight is regular. Then according to [W5,Cor. 3.9], the interior analogous to Lemma 8.4, one would need to analyze the restriction of the morphism of models of toroidal compactifications from [La2,Thm.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8.6] is induced by an irreducible representation of G, whose highest weight is regular. Then according to [W5,Cor. 3.9], the interior analogous to Lemma 8.4, one would need to analyze the restriction of the morphism of models of toroidal compactifications from [La2,Thm.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the conservativity conjecture implies the log Bloch conjecture for U . Part of our main theorem then follows from a special case of the conservativity conjecture proven by Wildeshaus [Wil15].…”
Section: Example 3: Q-homology Planesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…3. In the current paper we use the "homological convention" for weight structures; it was previously used in [Wil15], [Wil18], [Heb11], [Bon14], [BoI15], [BoS18b], [Bon16], [BoK18], [Bon18a], and in [Bon19], whereas in [Bon10a], [Bon10b], and [BoT17] the "cohomological convention" was used. In the latter convention the roles of C w≤0 and C w≥0 are interchanged, i.e., one considers C w≤0 = C w≥0 and C w≥0 = C w≤0 .…”
Section: We Will Say Thatmentioning
confidence: 99%