1977
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(77)90308-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the interpretation of evaporation residue mass distributions in heavy-ion induced fusion reactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
308
0
2

Year Published

1980
1980
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,025 publications
(319 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
9
308
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Typically, particle transmission coefficients are not discussed in great detail in the compiled works. The level-density models are either the Pühlhofer model [39] (the default in the statistical-model code CASCADE [39]) or the Reisdorf model [40]. The Pühlhofer model relies on the local Dilg et al parameterization [41] for excitation energies up to and slightly above the nucleon separation energy, while it interpolates then to a regime where the level-density parameter a becomes proportional to the nuclear mass number A.…”
Section: Statistical-model Calculations and Comparison To Experimentamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, particle transmission coefficients are not discussed in great detail in the compiled works. The level-density models are either the Pühlhofer model [39] (the default in the statistical-model code CASCADE [39]) or the Reisdorf model [40]. The Pühlhofer model relies on the local Dilg et al parameterization [41] for excitation energies up to and slightly above the nucleon separation energy, while it interpolates then to a regime where the level-density parameter a becomes proportional to the nuclear mass number A.…”
Section: Statistical-model Calculations and Comparison To Experimentamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several publications have focused on the production of neutron-deficient compound nuclei (CN) with Z = 83-87 [1][2][3][4][5] and comparisons of the experimental data with model calculations. Various models [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] have been proposed to reproduce EvR cross sections by adjusting parameters such as the fission barrier height or including phenomena such as collective enhancements [14] and fission dissipation [15]; however, there is still no consensus on how to best reproduce the experimental data. Andreyev et al produced neutron-deficient isotopes of Bi [1], Po [1], and At [2] and observed significant contributions from pxn evaporation channels that competed effectively with the xn channels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in each case. The codes that will be considered here are PACE2 [3], LILITA [20,21] and CASCADE [6,22]. (It is worth mentioning that two mistakes were discovered and corrected in the neutron optical-model potential parameters appearing in the PACE2 source code: a).-The coefficient of the E 2 term in V was 0.0018, corrected to 0.00118 (see [23], [24]).…”
Section: Absolute Normalization Of Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2]), evaporation alpha particles rather than protons were measured and fusion cross sections were deduced using the evaporation code CASCADE ( [6]). The multiplicity issue that was favourable for the 8 B + 58 Ni system becomes a liability in this case because the respective alpha-particle multiplicity is low (M α ∼ 0.5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%