2022
DOI: 10.3390/su14010574
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Issues of Spatial Modeling of Non-Standard Profiles by the Example of Electromagnetic Emission Measurement Data

Abstract: This paper examines the possibility of the spatial modelling of the Earth’s natural pulsed-electromagnetic-field measured values, which form a closed profile without the data inside. This geophysical method allows us to map active tectonic movement which breaches the integrity of pipes. During the experiment, 4.5 km of profiles were measured in the Admiralteysky district of St. Petersburg, Russia. Regular electromotive force (EMF) values and anomalous EMF values were obtained, ranging from 0 to 900 µV and abov… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, a two-dimensional curve characterized by the relationship between the methane concentration and distance S at different times, as well as the methane concentration change over time at different positions, is insufficiently representative (see Figure 2 in [26]) owing to the deformation of a three-dimensional surface when it is projected onto a two-dimensional plane. This conceptual imperfection in the methodological approach does not allow for adequately Spatial analysis of heterogeneous data remains one of the most difficult tasks of predicting the distribution of the response function over the factor space [52], solved using different approaches: fuzzy logic in MATLAB fuzzy logic [53]; stochastic modeling [54][55][56]; wavelet analysis with the Morlet algorithm (CWT) [57,58]; analytical methods based on using trigonometric relationships for quadratic surfaces [59]; nearest neighbor method [60]; inverse weighted distance (IDW) method [61]; multivariate nonlinear regression in SPSS software, www.ibm.com/spss [62]; and machine learning [63], fuzzy cognitive map (FCM) [64], or artificial neural networks (ANN) [65], using GIS technologies-crunching methods [66][67][68]. At the same time, deterministic methods of three-dimensional data interpolation have not lost their relevance [69].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a two-dimensional curve characterized by the relationship between the methane concentration and distance S at different times, as well as the methane concentration change over time at different positions, is insufficiently representative (see Figure 2 in [26]) owing to the deformation of a three-dimensional surface when it is projected onto a two-dimensional plane. This conceptual imperfection in the methodological approach does not allow for adequately Spatial analysis of heterogeneous data remains one of the most difficult tasks of predicting the distribution of the response function over the factor space [52], solved using different approaches: fuzzy logic in MATLAB fuzzy logic [53]; stochastic modeling [54][55][56]; wavelet analysis with the Morlet algorithm (CWT) [57,58]; analytical methods based on using trigonometric relationships for quadratic surfaces [59]; nearest neighbor method [60]; inverse weighted distance (IDW) method [61]; multivariate nonlinear regression in SPSS software, www.ibm.com/spss [62]; and machine learning [63], fuzzy cognitive map (FCM) [64], or artificial neural networks (ANN) [65], using GIS technologies-crunching methods [66][67][68]. At the same time, deterministic methods of three-dimensional data interpolation have not lost their relevance [69].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most cases, the geostatistical methods for the three-dimensional interpolation of spatial data are performed on the basis of stochastic methods (kriging) [ 38 ] in pure form or in combination with machine learning (for example, ANN [ 39 ] or random forest method [ 40 ]). Thus, the use of “classical” deterministic methods (for example, the k-nearest neighbor method or the finite elements method) is significantly reduced.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%