2015
DOI: 10.37236/4958
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Largest Component of a Hyperbolic Model of Complex Networks

Abstract: We consider a model for complex networks that was introduced by Krioukov et al.  In this model, $N$ points are chosen randomly inside a disk on the hyperbolic plane and any two of them are joined by an  edge if they are within a certain hyperbolic distance.  The $N$ points are distributed according to a quasi-uniform distribution, which is a distorted version of  the uniform distribution. The model turns out to behave similarly to the well-known Chung-Lu model, but without the independence between the edges. N… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
79
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
79
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As the graph size tends to infinity, most models have a vanishing average clustering coefficient. Therefore, among other methods to increase clustering such as the hierarchical configuration model [52], spatial random graph models have been introduced, including the spatial preferential attachment model (SPA) [3], power-law radius geometric random graphs [46,77], the hyperbolic random graph (HRG) [18,19,63], and the models that we study in this paper, scale-free percolation on Z d (SFP) [32], their continuum analogue on R d [34] and the geometric inhomogeneous random graph (GIRG) [23], respectively. The SFP and GIRG can be seen as the spatial counterparts of the Norros-Reitu and the Chung-Lu graph, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the graph size tends to infinity, most models have a vanishing average clustering coefficient. Therefore, among other methods to increase clustering such as the hierarchical configuration model [52], spatial random graph models have been introduced, including the spatial preferential attachment model (SPA) [3], power-law radius geometric random graphs [46,77], the hyperbolic random graph (HRG) [18,19,63], and the models that we study in this paper, scale-free percolation on Z d (SFP) [32], their continuum analogue on R d [34] and the geometric inhomogeneous random graph (GIRG) [23], respectively. The SFP and GIRG can be seen as the spatial counterparts of the Norros-Reitu and the Chung-Lu graph, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the t i 's follow a power-law with exponent τ [10], so that the degrees have a power-law distribution as well. The t i 's can be interpreted as the weights in a hidden-variable model [10].…”
Section: Local Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the t i 's follow a power-law with exponent τ [10], so that the degrees have a power-law distribution as well. The t i 's can be interpreted as the weights in a hidden-variable model [10]. Because the degrees and the types of vertices have the same scaling, we investigate the probability that two neighbors of a vertex of type k connect.…”
Section: Local Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations