We point out that a recent model for the heat capacity of -U that invokes charge-density-wave (CDW) collective modes is unphysical. We show instead that the features in the heat capacity of both single crystal and polycrystalline -U can be accounted for by a number of Peierls transitions that are subject to increased disorder in the polycrystalline sample.The fundamental flaw in the interpretation of Uranium heat capacity (C p ) reported in [1] concerns the relative temperature scales of the CDW collective mode (to which phenomena in C p are attributed) and the CDW transitions. For the collective mode to be a valid description of the lowest-energy excited state of the CDW, the temperature (T) should be such that pair breaking is completely negligible; e.g., for the CDW material TaSe 4 2 I the Peierls transition occurs at 263 K, whereas collective mode contributions to C p are observed for T & 1:7 K [2]. By contrast, the authors of Ref.[1] claim erroneously that collective mode contributions are responsible for phenomena at and around the CDW ordering T's, where the single-particle gap is closing, and subgap excitations will be smeared out.Reference [1] contains important technical errors. First, when the model of [1] is plotted over the whole T range of the C p anomalies [ Fig. 1(a), curves], rather than the restricted ranges used in [1] [ Fig. 1(a), bold lines], it is clear that the model bears no resemblance to the data. Second, Mihaila et al. incorrectly substitute D for in the model. It is explicitly stated in [2] that is the Debye T for phasons ( & 10 K), which is distinct from the Debye T for phonons ( D ' 256 K). These quantities have different origins, and differ by at least an order of magnitude. Third, Mihaila et al. use polycrystal data as a background, assuming that there is no contribution from CDWs. However, if the background C p is modeled, it can be seen that peaks associated with CDWs are present in both single crystal and polycrystal data [ Fig. 1(b)].The peaks in C p should instead be attributed to the second order CDW transitions. These can be modeled as disordered system Peierls transitions (DPTs) [3,4]. The increased disorder in the polycrystal relative to the single crystal leads to the transitions being broadened or destroyed. By removing the smooth background of C p [4], three transitions in the single crystal [ Fig. 1(c)] [5] were revealed. In the polycrystal an excess C p was evident in the T range of transitions 1 and 2 in the single crystal, with transition 3 absent [ Fig. 1(d)]. The DPT model fits the data well in both cases [Figs. 1(c) and 1(d)].Transition 1 is the onset of the three CDWs, all incommensurate. At transition 2, q x locks into 0:5a , and at transition 3, q y and q z lock into 1 6 b and 2 11 c , respectively [6]. Owing to the large periodicity of the CDWs locking into the lattice at transition 3 (6b and 5:5c), it should be the transition most affected by disorder, explaining its disappearance in the polycrystal. This is consistent with observations of similar ordering ...