2016
DOI: 10.1002/2016rs005966
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the mutual relationship of the equatorial electrojet, TEC and scintillation in the Peruvian sector

Abstract: This paper presents the interrelationship between the equatorial electrojet (EEJ) strength, Global Positioning System (GPS)‐derived total electron content (TEC), and postsunset scintillation from ground observations with the aim of finding reliable precursors of the occurrence of ionospheric irregularities. Mutual relationship studies provide a possible route to predict the occurrence of TEC fluctuation and scintillation in the ionosphere during the late afternoon and night respectively based on daytime measur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The strength of EIA asymmetry is calculated by taking the ratio of the maximum value of the two hemispheric anomaly TEC crests values. Besides the meridional neutral winds, dragging force due to continuous ion accumulation, sudden stratospheric warming, solar fluxes, atmospheric tides, change in composition due to magnetic perturbations, and photochemical process are also responsible factors for the asymmetry of the EIA peaks (Abdu et al, , ; Dang et al, ; Goncharenko et al, ; Hanson & Moffett, ; Immel et al, ; Jonah et al, ; Khadka et al, ; Tulasi Ram et al, ; Xiong et al, ). In this study, we particularly focused on analyzing the contribution of meridional neutral wind for the asymmetry generation of EIA using observational and modeled winds in the low‐latitude ionosphere.…”
Section: Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The strength of EIA asymmetry is calculated by taking the ratio of the maximum value of the two hemispheric anomaly TEC crests values. Besides the meridional neutral winds, dragging force due to continuous ion accumulation, sudden stratospheric warming, solar fluxes, atmospheric tides, change in composition due to magnetic perturbations, and photochemical process are also responsible factors for the asymmetry of the EIA peaks (Abdu et al, , ; Dang et al, ; Goncharenko et al, ; Hanson & Moffett, ; Immel et al, ; Jonah et al, ; Khadka et al, ; Tulasi Ram et al, ; Xiong et al, ). In this study, we particularly focused on analyzing the contribution of meridional neutral wind for the asymmetry generation of EIA using observational and modeled winds in the low‐latitude ionosphere.…”
Section: Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5.2°S, 279.4°E, 6.8°N dip latitude) in the American low latitudes. As described in Khadka et al (), magnetometer readings of H from each station are normalized with its midnight average background values for each day and subtracted to get only the electrojet contribution to H. The difference of electrojet effect on H between two magnetometers located at equator and off‐equator (6° to 9° away) is defined as the EEJ strength.…”
Section: Instrumentation Data Sets and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During intense geomagnetic storms, a plausible and useful theory behind the dramatic increase in ionospheric electron density and total electron content is the immediate consequence of prompt penetration electric fields (PPEF), that generally tend to arise during the main phase of the storm, and may keep going for a few hours (Khadka et al., 2016). PPEF penetrating from high latitudes to the equatorial region create an ionospheric “superfountain” that vertically advects plasma from low to mid‐latitudes through E × B drift (Chapagain et al., 2012; Khadka et al., 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several works have investigated the ionospheric scintillation at the SA sector at some periods of solar cycle 24, which has just ended (e.g., De Rezende et al, 2010;Sreeja et al, 2011;Bougard et al, 2013;Alfonsi et al, 2013;Spogli et al, 2013aSpogli et al, , 2013bCesaroni et al, 2015, Khadka et al, 2016Muella et al, 2017;Correia et al, 2018;Guo et al, 2019;De Paula et al, 2019;Oliveira et al, 2020). Some of these works are worthwhile to highlight.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%