1970
DOI: 10.1515/ling.1970.8.63.51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Natural Domain of Grammar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1972
1972
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although linguists in Europe did include what later came to be known as information structure and thematization within linguistics structure, and Pike (1954) characterized discourse as verbal behavior and attempted to integrate language and behavior, it is only recently that linguistics as a discipline has begun to look at units larger than the sentence to account for linguistic data. Recent studies of this nature include, among others, Dik (1968), Givon (1979), Grimes (1975), Chafe (1970), Sanders (1970), Fillmore (1970), van Dijk (1977, de Beaugrande (1980), and papers in volumes such as Freedle (1979), and Tannen (1982a;1982b;1982c).…”
Section: Linguistics and Discourse Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although linguists in Europe did include what later came to be known as information structure and thematization within linguistics structure, and Pike (1954) characterized discourse as verbal behavior and attempted to integrate language and behavior, it is only recently that linguistics as a discipline has begun to look at units larger than the sentence to account for linguistic data. Recent studies of this nature include, among others, Dik (1968), Givon (1979), Grimes (1975), Chafe (1970), Sanders (1970), Fillmore (1970), van Dijk (1977, de Beaugrande (1980), and papers in volumes such as Freedle (1979), and Tannen (1982a;1982b;1982c).…”
Section: Linguistics and Discourse Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, Sanders and co-workers (Sanders 1970;Sanders et al 1975Sanders et al ,1980 showed that improved skill in track forecasts could be achieved in general by applying the barotropic vorticity equation to a pressure-weighted vertical average of the tropospheric winds, in conjunction with an initial analysis based directly on the observed winds. These investigations concentrated mainly on the operational applications and especially on the problems of constructing an adequate initial analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As was remarked above, S-grammars and T-grammars can be explicitly compared only if this last type is worked out in detail (and if both are formalized). Given the empirical facts and the theoretical assumptions mentioned in the previous paragraph, we may adopt the hypothesis of Sanders (1969) that S-grammars are not 'natural theories' of specific languages, because the infinite set of sentences is not a natural domain since it is included in the infinite set of the well-formed texts of a language. S-grammars thus satisfy the set of reducibility conditions with respect to T-grammars: all their interpreted elements, their axioms, and their rules are proper subsets of those of T-grammars.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%