1976
DOI: 10.1016/0022-460x(76)90095-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the nature of idling noise of circular saw blades

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To accurately calculate the aerodynamic noise contribution due to the cutter alone, the sound spectrum plots for the total noise and noise due to spindle rotation were obtained, the difference between total noise and spindle noise was around 1.0 dB for all cases. The comparisons of the sound pressure level calculated by the model and the experimental observations of aerodynamics noise due to cutter rotating at the various tip velocities are shown in Figure 4 (v 0 is the reference velocity (1.0 m/s) and v is the tip velocity [3]). The model predicted SPL is, on average, roughly 2.0 dB less than the experimentally observed SPL.…”
Section: Model Validationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To accurately calculate the aerodynamic noise contribution due to the cutter alone, the sound spectrum plots for the total noise and noise due to spindle rotation were obtained, the difference between total noise and spindle noise was around 1.0 dB for all cases. The comparisons of the sound pressure level calculated by the model and the experimental observations of aerodynamics noise due to cutter rotating at the various tip velocities are shown in Figure 4 (v 0 is the reference velocity (1.0 m/s) and v is the tip velocity [3]). The model predicted SPL is, on average, roughly 2.0 dB less than the experimentally observed SPL.…”
Section: Model Validationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the major source of aerodynamic noise for the inserted face milling cutters rotating at high speeds is predominant due to dipole sources and the effect of quadrupole noise source is found to be negligible. Third, the noise generated at far-field is of interest, namely, the observation point should be placed at a distance of at least ten times the cutter radius [3,6] (preliminary experiments showed that most of the important noise generating frequencies were between 550 Hz and 3000 Hz, the major noise wavelength was between 0.113 m and 0.62 m according to the relationship of sound speed, wavelength and noise frequencies, so the far-field assumption is valid). This result is…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The aeroacoustic noise from face milling cutters is usually caused by the 3D unsteady flow around the cutters, namely, by the air flow fluctuation as a result of the interaction between air flow and cutter surface [6]. Sampath et al [2] experimentally determined the characteristics of sound sources in face milling, and found that the dipole-like is the major source of aerodynamic noise for milling cutters rotating at high speeds and the effect of quadrupole sources on the sound pressure level appears to be negligible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%