[1992 Proceedings] IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems
DOI: 10.1109/fuzzy.1992.258640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the optimal choice of parameters in a fuzzy c-means algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Bzddekde [17] claimed that a better clustering will be achieved when m ranges from 1.5 to 3.0. Choe and Jordan [18] found that the algorithm is not susceptive to m when it ranges from 8 to 30. Cannon [19,20] …”
Section: The Degree Of Fuzziness Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bzddekde [17] claimed that a better clustering will be achieved when m ranges from 1.5 to 3.0. Choe and Jordan [18] found that the algorithm is not susceptive to m when it ranges from 8 to 30. Cannon [19,20] …”
Section: The Degree Of Fuzziness Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lin und Lee (1996), Chen (1996). AnschlieBend werden zwei fuzzyfizierte Netze, Fuzzy-Assoziativspeicher und Fuzzy-Kohonen-Netze kurz beschrieben.…”
Section: Fuzzy-neuronale Netzeunclassified
“…There are several methods of fuzzy clustering (Yuan et al, 1995;Kamei et al, 1992;Choe and Jordan, 1992;Cheng et al, 1995;Berks et al, 2000), out of which, FCM clustering is the most popular one, due to not only its flexibility and robustness (Bezdek, 1974) but also its ability to render reliable and steady clusters, that is desired in a data mining research (Murase et al, 2004). It is an iterative approach, where data points are members of the clusters (whose numbers are pre-defined) with some membership values (i.e., degrees of belongingness).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%