2016
DOI: 10.3150/15-bej713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the optimal estimation of probability measures in weak and strong topologies

Abstract: Given random samples drawn i.i.d. from a probability measure P (defined on say, R d ), it is well-known that the empirical estimator is an optimal estimator of P in weak topology but not even a consistent estimator of its density (if it exists) in the strong topology (induced by the total variation distance). On the other hand, various popular density estimators such as kernel and wavelet density estimators are optimal in the strong topology in the sense of achieving the minimax rate over all estimators for a … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The desired result follows from [40], as quoted by [31,Theorem 1.1]. The arguments for other counterfactual distributions are identical.…”
Section: Denote the Samples Constructed Bymentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The desired result follows from [40], as quoted by [31,Theorem 1.1]. The arguments for other counterfactual distributions are identical.…”
Section: Denote the Samples Constructed Bymentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The desired result follows from [68], as quoted by [62,Theorem 1.1]. The arguments for other counterfactual distributions are identical.…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Here we impose two conditions on the RKHS: universality and that the unit ball is P-Donsker. These conditions hold for most commonly used kernels, such as the Gaussian kernel and Matérn kernel (Sriperumbudur et al, 2016).…”
Section: Asymptotic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 95%