1972
DOI: 10.1214/aoms/1177692621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Optimality of Some Multiple Comparison Procedures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
67
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The two procedures are different when p k varies across groups. As argued by Storey (2007), the setting considered in Spjøtvoll (1972) is problematic because of the wrong definitions of "ETP" and "EFP," which do not represent the underlying reality. It can be shown that this wrong formulation naturally leads to a procedure that ignores p k , which provides important information for ranking the hypotheses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two procedures are different when p k varies across groups. As argued by Storey (2007), the setting considered in Spjøtvoll (1972) is problematic because of the wrong definitions of "ETP" and "EFP," which do not represent the underlying reality. It can be shown that this wrong formulation naturally leads to a procedure that ignores p k , which provides important information for ranking the hypotheses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Storey (2007) proposed the optimal discovery procedure (ODP) based on a shrinkage test statistic that maximizes the expected number of true positives (ETP) for a fixed level of the expected number of false positives (EFP). The result of Storey (2007) on the ODP follows directly from the theorem of Spjøtvoll (1972) by choosing appropriate f 0t and f t . In the setting of the present article, both Spjøtvoll's optimal procedure and Storey's ODP procedure depend on unknown functions that are not estimable from the data.…”
Section: Connection To Work Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We provide more numerical comparisons in Section 5, and show that the z value oracle procedure yields a lower mFNR level than the p value oracle procedure on all possible configurations of alternative hypotheses, with the difference significant in many cases. Spjøtvoll (1972) and Storey (2007) An "optimal" multiple-testing procedure was introduced by Spjøtvoll (1972 …”
Section: The Oracle Procedures Based On the P Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations