1977
DOI: 10.1016/0014-5793(77)80914-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the origin of the cyanolysable sulphur in molybdenum iron/sulphur flavin hydroxylases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1978
1978
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bray & Swann (1972) suggested that the sulphur might be a ligand of molybdenum. More specifically, Coughlan (1977) proposed cysteine sulphur liganded to molybdenum. However, evidence that this could give rise to thiocyanate, on treatment with cyanide, seems slight.…”
Section: (Received 12 May 1978)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bray & Swann (1972) suggested that the sulphur might be a ligand of molybdenum. More specifically, Coughlan (1977) proposed cysteine sulphur liganded to molybdenum. However, evidence that this could give rise to thiocyanate, on treatment with cyanide, seems slight.…”
Section: (Received 12 May 1978)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thiol reagent used at 2.5M concentration inactivates also xanthine oxidase from milk (Harris & Hellerman, 1956). Possibly this reagent reacts with the thiol group of cysteine in the proximity of the molybdenum centre involved in hydroxylation of purine substrate (Coughlan, 1977;Coughlan etal., 1980). On the other hand, 4-chloromercuribenzoate at concentrations up to 5 ,M increased the total activity of the enzyme preparation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Edmondson et al [31] have proposed that the S-binding covalently to the carbon is part of a persulphide group proposed by Massey and Edmondson [32]. We prefer the proposal of Coughlan [33] that the -S -is part of a cysteinyl residue which is bound to the molybdenum but when the substrate reacts at the active site the bond between the cysteinyl sulphur and the molybdenum is broken. This explanation is preferred since according to the model presented here the sulphur and the molybdenum are 0.35 nm apart; thus if there is any movement of these atoms they could easily come within the bonding distance of 0.23 nm [34].…”
Section: The Geometry O J the Active Sitementioning
confidence: 97%