2021
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2020.1041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the origins of steady streaming in precessing fluids

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
8
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using this value and (4.25), the total kinetic energy is found to be E = 0.0025. This kinetic energy is approximately 30 % lower than the kinetic energy found in numerical simulations by isolating the azimuthal wavenumber m = 1 (Albrecht et al 2021). Equation (5.1) thus underestimates the amplitude A by approximately 14 % in this case.…”
Section: Comparison With Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Using this value and (4.25), the total kinetic energy is found to be E = 0.0025. This kinetic energy is approximately 30 % lower than the kinetic energy found in numerical simulations by isolating the azimuthal wavenumber m = 1 (Albrecht et al 2021). Equation (5.1) thus underestimates the amplitude A by approximately 14 % in this case.…”
Section: Comparison With Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…In order to compare our theoretical results with the numerical results of Albrecht et al (2021), we focus on the aspect ratio h = 1.62 for which the (1, 1) resonance is obtained at a forcing frequency ω 1,1 = 1.181 (table 1). The tilt angle is small, ϕ = 0.4 • , and corresponds to a forcing amplitude ε = −0.00127, such that there is no instability in the numerical simulations at Ek = 1.538 × 10 −4 .…”
Section: Comparison With Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To the best of our knowledge, there have been no serious attempts to tackle this problem in its full beauty, including a realistic orbital motion, the 7 degree inclination of the Sun's rotation axis, and an alleged non-sphericity of the tachocline with a prolateness that might even vary with the magnetic field strength (Dikpati and Gilman, 2001). In this respect, we recall a relatively recent result on the similar problem of precession, for which a significant braking of the (solid body like) rotational profile was observed already for weak precessional forcing (Giesecke et al, 2018(Giesecke et al, , 2019Albrecht et al, 2021). If such a braking effect would also occur in the solar spin-orbit coupling problem (cf.…”
Section: Summary and Open Problemsmentioning
confidence: 86%