2005
DOI: 10.1088/0029-5515/45/7/020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the parasitic absorption in FWCD experiments in JET ITB plasmas

Abstract: The heating during the FWCD is strongly degraded compared to dipole heating. The FWCD has only a small effect on the central current density. The main reasons are the parasitic absorption of RF power, the strongly inductive nature of the plasma and the interplay between the fast wave driven current and bootstrap current.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the FWHCD experiments reported in Section 5 [30], η(0π0π) was similar to that of hydrogen minority heating in +90°. The heating efficiencies for ±90° FWCD phasings were η(+90°)~0.6 η(0π0π) and η(-90°)~0.5 η(0π0π), with a difference attributed to 3 He orbit pinch effects.…”
Section: New Investigations Of the Icrf Heating Efficiencysupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the FWHCD experiments reported in Section 5 [30], η(0π0π) was similar to that of hydrogen minority heating in +90°. The heating efficiencies for ±90° FWCD phasings were η(+90°)~0.6 η(0π0π) and η(-90°)~0.5 η(0π0π), with a difference attributed to 3 He orbit pinch effects.…”
Section: New Investigations Of the Icrf Heating Efficiencysupporting
confidence: 56%
“…This is the same f/B 0 ratio as planned for ITER, at which the hydrogen and deuterium fundamental cyclotron layers are both outside the plasma, respectively on the low and high magnetic field sides of the discharge. This section only provides a brief summary of the experiments, and we refer the reader to [30] for a comprehensive account. Traces of residual and electron Landau damping (ELD).…”
Section: Fast Wave Heating and Current Drive (Fwhcd) Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to the absence of stringent accessibility limitations for the FW, and to the availability of reliable RF generators in the ICRF, this method is attractive for next-step fusion reactors, including during H-mode operation [5][6][7]. On the other hand, FW current drive (FWCD) is known to be experimentally challenging due to low absorptivity of the FW electron damping mechanisms and/or to parasitic damping of the wave by ions, even at rather high harmonics of the cyclotron resonance [8]. In ITER, the situation is different compared with most past experiments [9], as no 'pure' FWCD scheme is readily available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to the robustness of the underlying technologies and to their versatility, waves in the ion cyclotron range of frequencies (ICRFs) are routinely employed in magnetic fusion devices and, as such, constitute one of the key elements for the success of future reactors [1]. Although plasma ion heating through minority fundamental absorption or harmonic damping is currently the most widespread scenario and is therefore favoured in plans for next-step experiments, ICRF waves also offer other possibilities, such as electron heating and/or non-inductive current drive either by direct damping of the fast magnetosonic wave excited by the antenna [2] or by damping of mode converted short wavelength kinetic waves [3], sawtooth stabilization by ion cyclotron current drive [4], and may even be used to generate plasma rotation [5]. Alfvén waves propagate at frequencies below the lowest ion cyclotron frequency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(nres)part,s = − 0 d 3 rω2 ps |A| 2 − (2π)Since the equilibrium distribution function is independent of the generalized angles, it is possible to use the Parseval identity for the Hamiltonian:N |δh N | 2 = 1 (2π) 3 d 3 Φ |δH s | 2 . (B.9)In accordance with equation (50), the particle unperturbed velocity is given by v s,0 ≡ v ⊥ [cos(φ c )e ⊥1 − sin(φ c )e ⊥2 ]+v e with φ c the gyro-angle.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%