2010 IEEE International Symposium on Network Coding (NetCod) 2010
DOI: 10.1109/netcod.2010.5487688
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Performance of Network Coding in Multi-Resolution Wireless Video Streaming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, there have also been a few practical works that demonstrated the effectiveness of combining MRC video streaming with variations of the canonical triangular coding 2 scheme for multihop wireless networks [7], [8]. [7] uses the triangular coding scheme combined with ARQ and a creditbased rate control system but it assumes that each client requests the desired number of layers from the server.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Recently, there have also been a few practical works that demonstrated the effectiveness of combining MRC video streaming with variations of the canonical triangular coding 2 scheme for multihop wireless networks [7], [8]. [7] uses the triangular coding scheme combined with ARQ and a creditbased rate control system but it assumes that each client requests the desired number of layers from the server.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7] uses the triangular coding scheme combined with ARQ and a creditbased rate control system but it assumes that each client requests the desired number of layers from the server. In contrast, in our work, the AP automatically determines the optimal number of layers and the optimal coding strategy for any objective function.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the first case, users 2 are heterogeneous and have different subscription levels, thus requiring a different resolution of the content [9]. In the second case, the receivers are not able to receive the whole content due to channel fading, that can be modeled as erasures at higher layers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%