2011 8th International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems 2011
DOI: 10.1109/iswcs.2011.6125401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the performance of non-binary LDPC with MIMO in practical systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noteworthy here that sub-optimal linear equalizers may be considered for the STBC detection, which will then be followed in a second step by the APP computation for non-binary LDPC decoder. Such linear approach was compared to the soft ML demapper in [4,10], where the latter was shown to significantly outperform the former. It is not in the scope of this article to reproduce such comparison, but rather focus on the complexity reduction of the soft ML demapper with the aim to make it practical for wireless communication systems.…”
Section: Receiver Operationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noteworthy here that sub-optimal linear equalizers may be considered for the STBC detection, which will then be followed in a second step by the APP computation for non-binary LDPC decoder. Such linear approach was compared to the soft ML demapper in [4,10], where the latter was shown to significantly outperform the former. It is not in the scope of this article to reproduce such comparison, but rather focus on the complexity reduction of the soft ML demapper with the aim to make it practical for wireless communication systems.…”
Section: Receiver Operationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the same number of transmit antennas, achieved spectral efficiencies are higher than [8], [5], [7] which limited the constellation size due to the GF size. The main differences between this research and most similar papers [9], [lO] are described as follows. The paper [9] also combines a non-binary LDPC code with a space-time mapper, but considers a non-iterative receiver.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The main differences between this research and most similar papers [9], [lO] are described as follows. The paper [9] also combines a non-binary LDPC code with a space-time mapper, but considers a non-iterative receiver. A factor graph approach is adopted in [lO] and used to derive conditions for a cycle free interleaved coded modulation graph, but the current work demonstrates strong iterative performance even with cycles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%