2018
DOI: 10.3150/17-bej932
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Poisson equation for Metropolis–Hastings chains

Abstract: This paper defines an approximation scheme for a solution of the Poisson equation of a geometrically ergodic Metropolis-Hastings chain Φ. The scheme is based on the idea of weak approximation and gives rise to a natural sequence of control variates for the ergodic average S k (F ) = (1/k) k i=1 F (Φi), where F is the force function in the Poisson equation. The main results show that the sequence of the asymptotic variances (in the CLTs for the control-variate estimators) converges to zero and give a rate of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As such they achieve at most a constant factor reduction in estimator variance. Intuitively, one would like to increase the number m of basis functions to increase in line with the number n. Mijatović and Vogrinc (2015) explored this approach within the Metropolis-Hastings method. However, their solution requires the user to partition the state space, which limits its wider appeal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such they achieve at most a constant factor reduction in estimator variance. Intuitively, one would like to increase the number m of basis functions to increase in line with the number n. Mijatović and Vogrinc (2015) explored this approach within the Metropolis-Hastings method. However, their solution requires the user to partition the state space, which limits its wider appeal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to illustrate the construction from Remark 26, let g : (R d × R d ) → R d×d be a field of orthogonal matrices (see (62)) and put…”
Section: The General Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This idea is motivated by the observation that the methods listed above are (in effect) solving a misspecified regression problem, since in general f does not belong to the linear span of the statistics {ψ i } k i=1 . The recent work by Mijatović and Vogrinc (2015); Oates et al (2017) alleviates model misspecification by increasing the number k of statistics alongside the number n of samples so that the limiting space spanned by the statistics {ψ i } ∞ i=1 is dense in a class of functions that contains the test function f of interest. Both methods provide a non-parametric alternative to classical control variates whose error is o P (n − 1 2 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both methods provide a non-parametric alternative to classical control variates whose error is o P (n − 1 2 ). Of these two proposed solutions, Mijatović and Vogrinc (2015) is not considered here since it is unclear how to proceed when Π is known only up to a normalisation constant. On the other hand the control functional method of Oates et al (2017) is straight-forward to implement when gradients {∇ log π(x i )} n i=1 are provided.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%