A comparison of the number of oocytes in fourteen pairs of hypophysectomized and litter-mate control rats showed that the number was greater in nine of the fourteen comparisons, and less in only five. This ratio is not significantly different from one of 7 : 7. The mean total number of oocytes was, on the othei hand, about 20 % greater in the operated animals, the statistical significance of the difference falling between P = 0\m=.\05-0\m=.\02.If any physiological significance attaches to this difference, the most likely explanation is that the rate of decline in the number of oocytes is less after removal of the pituitary than in normal animals.In the course of a review of the problem of mammalian oogénesis, in which it was shown that the now widespread belief that oocytes are produced throughout life is very insecurely based, Zuckerman [1951] referred to an unconfirmed observation by Swezy [1933] that in the adult rat, the numbers of oocytes increase after the removal of the pituitary. This worker estimated the number of oocytes in one of the ovaries (usually the left) of five normal and eight hypophysectomized animals, and showed that it was consistently greater in the hypophysectomized animals.The conclusion she drew, that 'after hypophysectomy the rate of ovogénesis increases ', is not, however, the only one that can be derived from this observation. An alternative view is that after hypophysectomy the total number of oocytes does not decrease with age, as it does in the normal animal [Arai, 1920; Mandi & Zucker¬ man, 1951 ]. Such an interpretation would be reinforced by the fact that hypo¬ physectomized animals in Swezy's experiment were in general younger than the controls, so that regardless of other physiological considerations, one would expect them to possess more oocytes. There are two further aspects to this matter of controls. The first is that the variation in the total number of oocytes is greater between than within litters [Mandi & Zuckerman, 1950]. Since Swezy apparently did not use htter-mate controls, the differences between the two groups of animals in her experiment would thus tend to be exaggerated. The second is that Swezy paid attention only to the number of oocytes in a single ovary of each animal she studied. Comparisons made in this way can, however, lead to misleading conclusions, for although the mean numbers of oocytes in the left and right ovaries, as derived from the study of a series of animals, do not differ significantly, there may be a considerable difference in the numbers of oocytes in the two ovaries of an individual animal. It is therefore prudent to deal always with the numbers of oocytes in both ovaries.In a similar study Paesi [1949] estimated the numbers of oocytes in four rats whose right ovaries were removed at the time of hypophysectomy and used as controls for the left, which were excised at autopsy 8 days later. Paesi did not