2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmro.2022.100072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the potentially spurious contributions of cosolutes in protein 15N relaxation dispersion measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that caution has to be taken when interpreting relaxation dispersion data for different buffers due to their impact on the chemical shifts of ground and excitedstate conformations. [21][22][23] Figure 2(A, B) show the R ex rates for the proteins ubiquitin and MBP. For ubiquitin, which shows an overall extremely low [20] Boxes extend from the first to the third quartile with a line at the median.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that caution has to be taken when interpreting relaxation dispersion data for different buffers due to their impact on the chemical shifts of ground and excitedstate conformations. [21][22][23] Figure 2(A, B) show the R ex rates for the proteins ubiquitin and MBP. For ubiquitin, which shows an overall extremely low [20] Boxes extend from the first to the third quartile with a line at the median.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas such measurements can also inform on conformational‐exchange timescales and even populations, in this work we restrict our interpretation of differences in R ex between two salt concentrations as indicating a different extent of conformational exchange. Note that caution has to be taken when interpreting relaxation dispersion data for different buffers due to their impact on the chemical shifts of ground and excited‐state conformations [21–23] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%