It is easy to prove in ZF-(= Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory without the axioms of choice and foundation) that a relation R satisfies the maximal condition if and only if its transitive hull R' does; equivalently: R is well-founded if and only if R' is. We will show in the following that, if the maximal condition is replaced by the (finite ascending) chain condition, as is often the case in Algebra, the resulting statement is not provable in ZFanymore (if ZFis consistent). More precisely, we will prove that this statement is equivalent in ZFto the countable axiom of choice AC,. Moreover, applying this result we will prove that the axiom of dependent choices, restricted to partial orders as used in Algebra, already implies the general form for arbitrary relations as formulated first by Teichmiiller and, independently, some time later by Bernays and Tarski.Mathematics Subject Classification: 06B05, 08A65, 08B20, 03399.