2003
DOI: 10.1007/s10690-005-6008-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Pricing of Defaultable Bonds Using the Framework of Barrier Options

Abstract: In the framework of the structural approach of bond pricing, we extend the Fujita-Ishizaka model by considering more realistic payoffs. The payoff to the bondholder at time of default, provided that default occurs prior to maturity, depends on the firm value at time of default. We also find the new measure with the advantage to calculate the value of bond and its financial interpretation. In addition, we present some numerical exmaples.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Apuntamos también que este artículo se limita estrictamente al modelo de BC y, por lo tanto, no se discuten las generalizaciones posteriores como las de Longstaff & Schartz (1995) y Cathcart & El-Jahel (1998, que extendieron el modelo de BC considerando la tasa de interés como una variable estocástica, los de Fujita T. & Ishizaka M. (2002) e Ishizaka & Takaoka (2003) con la amortización de una deuda más realista, diferentes modelos de riesgo de crédito de Brigo & Tarenghi (2004), Brigo & Moroni (2006) y Nardon (2005), modelo del comercio con activos con riesgo de Holger Kraft & Mogens Steffensen, (2007), entre otros.…”
Section: Presentación De Resultados Principalesunclassified
“…Apuntamos también que este artículo se limita estrictamente al modelo de BC y, por lo tanto, no se discuten las generalizaciones posteriores como las de Longstaff & Schartz (1995) y Cathcart & El-Jahel (1998, que extendieron el modelo de BC considerando la tasa de interés como una variable estocástica, los de Fujita T. & Ishizaka M. (2002) e Ishizaka & Takaoka (2003) con la amortización de una deuda más realista, diferentes modelos de riesgo de crédito de Brigo & Tarenghi (2004), Brigo & Moroni (2006) y Nardon (2005), modelo del comercio con activos con riesgo de Holger Kraft & Mogens Steffensen, (2007), entre otros.…”
Section: Presentación De Resultados Principalesunclassified
“…However, with the strong influence of probabilistic methods in solving such PDEs, it is reasonable to consider parallel solution methods. One such approach is seen in the classical one factor models presented in Ishizaka and Takaoka (2003). By appealing to barrier option theory, the authors in Ishizaka and Takaoka (2003) utilize the measure Q with the Radon-Nikodym density process defined by the firm value A…”
Section: Bond Pricing In Stochastic Recovery Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computation of the PIT could involve the joint distribution of A T with quantities such as the running maximum, minimum, and average of A over the interval [t, T], among other quantities, depending on the new default set D. For example, one could consider the default time corresponding to the cumulative Parisian option, as detailed in Ishizaka and Takaoka (2003) and references within.…”
Section: Further Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although default risks, credit risks, or counterparty risks for the pricing and hedging of derivatives, company securities, or underlying assets have all been discussed in the financial literature, few works have examined the default risk embodied in option contracts. In looking at financial research, these issues can be classified as defaultable bond problems (e.g., Merton, ; Moraux, ; Uhrig‐Homburg, ; Ishizaka & Takaoka, ), vulnerable option problems (e.g., Johnson & Stulz, ; Klein, ), bankruptcy and debt problems (see Acharya & Carpenter, ; Anderson & Sundaresan, ; Broadie, Chernov, & Sundaresan, ; François & Morellec, ; Leland, ; Leland & Toft, ; Mella‐Barral, ; Mella‐Barral & Perraudin, ), and counterparty risk problems (see Chang & Hung, ; Hull & White, ; Hung & Liu, ; Klein, , etc.). The above literature has not discussed the case of allowing option sellers to freely walk away from their obligations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%