2007
DOI: 10.1002/sca.20002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Production of X‐rays by Low Energy Ion Beams

Abstract: Although electron beams with energies of a few keV can excite fluorescent X-ray production from solids, ion beams of comparable energy cannot do so. The reason for this situation is that it is the velocity of the incident particle, rather than its energy, which determines whether an ionization event can be generated.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11 However the number and energy of the backscattered ions do indicate the Figs. 1(a and b)), however this image is formed by transmistted electrons.…”
Section: Helium Ion Microscopymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…11 However the number and energy of the backscattered ions do indicate the Figs. 1(a and b)), however this image is formed by transmistted electrons.…”
Section: Helium Ion Microscopymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…When the incident particle is an electron, then these two energies are numerically identical when their velocities are the same, but when the incoming particle is a helium ion—which is about 7,800× heavier than an electron—then the kinetic energy of the ion must be 7,800× higher than that of the electron—i.e., about 70 MeV for Cu Kα—to achieve the velocity match that makes ionization possible. The correctness of this model is demonstrated theoretically by the fact that plots of the computed ionization cross sections for helium ions and electrons in a given material are closely similar in magnitude and form when plotted as a function of the respective particle velocities (Joy et al, 2007), and in practice by the extensive literature on PIXIE (proton induced X-ray ionization excitation) and related techniques (Johansson & Johansson, 1976). Some alternative procedure is therefore necessary if microanalytical capability is to be possible on the HIM whose maximum beam energy is limited to 50 keV or less.…”
Section: X-ray Microanalysismentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In order to simulate the stochastic exposure distribution in the resist, one may employ the Monte Carlo simulation. [13][14][15][16] A possible method, to be referred to as direct Monte Carlo method (DMC), is to generate a separate (instance of) point spread function (PSF), for each exposed point in a circuit pattern, which describes the exposure distribution in the resist when a point is exposed. While the exposure distribution derived (through convolution) by this method can be realistic, it is not practical since the number of points (or PSF's to be generated) is tremendous and generating a PSF requires a long computation time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%