1978
DOI: 10.1214/aos/1176344375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Properties of Proper $(M, S)$ Optimal Block Designs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…of D* are given by er where er = l-IX(1-ei) (i= 1,2, ...,v-l) (4) with IX = rk/(r* k*). It follows from (2), (3) and (4) that if D is (M, S) (or E)-optimal then D* is also (M,S) (or E)-optimal; see also Jacroux (1978).…”
Section: Complementary Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…of D* are given by er where er = l-IX(1-ei) (i= 1,2, ...,v-l) (4) with IX = rk/(r* k*). It follows from (2), (3) and (4) that if D is (M, S) (or E)-optimal then D* is also (M,S) (or E)-optimal; see also Jacroux (1978).…”
Section: Complementary Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Takeuchi (1961) showed that a group divisible PBIB/2 design with tt 2 = }'I + 1 is E-optimal. Other results on PBIB/2 designs have been given by Cheng (1978Cheng ( , 1980and Jacroux (1980). Cheng (1980) has also considered the 209 parameter sets studied by John and Mitchell (1977).…”
Section: Designs With K~vmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If Xi is an eigenvector of I~(rk)-l NN' corresponding to the eigenvalue e.; we have L'x, = 0 and (NN')xj = rk(l-ej)x j from which the result is readily obtained. It certainly follows, as shown by Jacroux (1978), that the complement design is (M, S)optimal if and only if the design is (M, S)-optimaI. However, we are also led to the observations that (i) The parameters P~k for the design and its complement are identical, since P~k is defined in terms of the matrices B 1 , ••• , B m and the parameters n 1 , ••• , n m , v. We note also that the bounds (3.3) and (3.4) are unchanged.…”
Section: Complement Designsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…(ii) E-optimality: C 2 = emin minimizes the maximum variance of any treatment contrast (Wald, 1943;Ehrenfeld, 1955;Cheng, 1980;Jacroux, 1980); (iii) D-optimality: C 3 = (TI i ey /(v-1 l , the geometric mean, minimizes the generalized variance (Wald, 1943);…”
Section: Canonical Efficiencies and Optimalitymentioning
confidence: 99%