TX 75083-3836, U.S.A., fax 01-972-952-9435.
AbstractAs the well flowing bottomhole pressure falls below the dew point, liquid dropout occurs in gas condensate reservoirs. Gas condensate well behavior is unique in a sense that it is characterized by severe loss of well deliverability. Thus well productivity and gas re-injection are two among the critical issues in development of many gas condensate reservoirs, particularly for the high condensate yield cases.Generally retrograde condensate is viewed immobile at reservoir conditions so that the standard dry gas flow equations based on flow-after-flow, isochronal and modified isochronal testing, etc., have frequently been used to analyze gas condensate well productivity. However, due to the combined effects of the bi-phase flow of gas and condensate near the wellbore and reduction in well deliverability caused by liquid buildup, this approach seems to be inadequate and usually leads to misleading results, suffering doubt and criticism up till now. Therefore, there is a need to develop a rigorous equation to express the thorough flow behavior of gas and condensate in porous media.Based on a detailed description of flow behavior in gas condensate pools, a definite solution problem is formulated. Subsequently the analytic solution is derived under pseudosteady-state conditions. The derivation procedures are detailed. Finally a rigorous overall deliverability equation desired is obtained by incorporating the effect of non-darcy flow in the vicinity of well bore. Then the parametric calculation methods are discussed briefly. A calculation example using the new equation is compared with the result calculated by the standard dry gas productivity equation. The comparison shows that the standard binomial productivity equation usually used in the dry gas condition over-predicts the production potential of gas condensate well.Additionally, in order to investigate the quantitative efficiency of condensate revaporized by lean gas injection, the laboratory experiments of gas injection have been made in a PVT cell, and above and below the dew point in a long core apparatus. Comparison of the tests shows more recovery of condensate in longcore above the dewpoint is obtained than below the dewpoint, justifying the popular argument with regard to the condensate recovery that the full pressure maintenance is superior to the partial pressure maintenance. However, the full pressure maintenance in the high-pressure reservoirs may not be the best choice due to the expensive investments on equipment. A comprehensive cost evaluation is suggested, but this is out of the scope of the present study.