2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the quantification of solid phases in hydrated cement paste by 1H nuclear magnetic resonance relaxometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The amount of bound water obtained by proton NMR is slightly lower than the amount of chemically bound water obtained from heating. As pointed out in a previous study (Holthausen and McDonald 2020), the separation of protons in solids and protons in liquid seems to need further improvement. The sample equilibrated at 98% RH showed the highest amount of chemically bound water, because hydration proceeded during the RH equilibration.…”
Section: Solid Echo Methodsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The amount of bound water obtained by proton NMR is slightly lower than the amount of chemically bound water obtained from heating. As pointed out in a previous study (Holthausen and McDonald 2020), the separation of protons in solids and protons in liquid seems to need further improvement. The sample equilibrated at 98% RH showed the highest amount of chemically bound water, because hydration proceeded during the RH equilibration.…”
Section: Solid Echo Methodsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…• A 4 (cap): Water in larger capillary pores Crystalline-bound water such as in portlandite or Ettringite, though being partly visible in this measurement, 14 requires other NMR devices and measurement schemes to be quantified 21,22 and thus, is not directly assessed here. In the past years, a comprehensive approach was followed to transfer this existing knowledge gathered on enclosed 1 H NMR devices on white cement pastes to the use of regular concrete samples using single-sided 1 H NMR devices.…”
Section: H Nuclear Magnetic Resonancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total water signal (ASum) was comparatively constant for the first hours, as all reactions were countered by a corresponding reduction of previously unbound water (A4). After about two hours, the total water signal (Asum) started to drop, indicating the development of crystalline hydration products not similarly well detectable to this 1 H NMR technique, such as gibbsite [13]. Last, through two-dimensional T1-T2-measurements [14] as shown in Figure 1c, a further empirical attribution of the different signals was proposed: Ettringite and monosulfate/carbonate originate from crystalline signal (A1), a finer silicate-containing pore structure (A2) and a coarser aluminate rich pore structure (A3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%