On the question of the methodology of research of administrative services in the field of construction

Abstract

The article identifies some aspects of the methodology of research of administrative services in the field of construction. The author points out the importance of applying in the practice of scientific knowledge the correct and complete arsenal of research methods and tools, which directly affects its comprehensiveness and quality, correctness of results.
 The author points out the position that having its own tasks, content and internal organization, the theory of administrative services in the field of construction is aimed at expanding, deepening, refining, systematizing, and improving the reliability of scientific data.
 The author defines the method of research of administrative services in the field of construction as rules or prescriptions of purposeful theoretical or practical activity within administrative services in the field of construction, as well as knowledge of rational methods, techniques, operations, procedures for their implementation.
 The author defends the position, the methodology must be determined through the doctrine of the method and study of the system of such methods, and we believe that the most important interpretation of the methodology of research of administrative services in construction is that it is a system of methods, approaches, methods of administrative science. rights during the implementation of research on administrative services in the field of construction.
 Within the study, the author points out the existence of methods-operations (analysis, synthesis, deduction, induction, etc.), which are mainly technology of working with scientific material, which should be distinguished from complex methods such as dialectics, synergetic, which are inherent in all sciences and effective within each with it. At the same time, private methods are used in jurisprudence: historical, concrete-sociological, psychological, mathematical, statistical methods and other methods. The author also proves the important role of the comparative law method.