2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the rationale and policy usefulness of Ecological Footprint Accounting: The case of Morocco

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
88
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(99 reference statements)
0
88
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the improved BC, this counterintuitive result may have two explanations. First, we used EF to account for the appropriation of land resources, but excluded the impacts on carbon, water, materials, nitrogen, and other resources, which were addressed by Galli et al [12] and Galli [13]. Second, the EF of egg and vegetable production decreased greatly due to increased productivity per unit area.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to the improved BC, this counterintuitive result may have two explanations. First, we used EF to account for the appropriation of land resources, but excluded the impacts on carbon, water, materials, nitrogen, and other resources, which were addressed by Galli et al [12] and Galli [13]. Second, the EF of egg and vegetable production decreased greatly due to increased productivity per unit area.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ecological footprint (EF) represents the area required for resource production and waste assimilation [11][12][13]. When the calculation is not based on site-specific or local data, as is often the case in large-scale or global studies, it may instead be based on the overall average productivity around the world, in which case the area unit is defined as a "global hectare" (gha).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As pointed out in numerous studies (e.g., [15,45]), EFA is useful for providing a basic overview of sustainability of an environmental system and can provide monitoring and a warning to advise policy makers to look more closely at their system, but it needs to be used in concert with other metrics and indicators. Several authors have discussed how such information can be used in policy decisions (e.g., [38,[44][45][46], but it has not been fully explored [45]. USEPA [17] participated in a dialogue with researchers, decision makers, and policy-makers, but it is not the goal of this paper to suggest or direct policy.…”
Section: Examination Of Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence the measurement unit does not reflect a physical area (for instance ha), but rather the bio-productivity thereof. For a detailed description of gha we refer to Galli (2015) not only refers to a physical area (in terms of ha), but also takes its ecological productivity (yield factor) into account (Borucke et al, 2013). Third, the EF is scientifically rigorous and widely accepted across the social sciences (Jorgenson & Clark, 2011).…”
Section: By "Measuring How Much Area Of Biologically Productive Land mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this stage, policy makers and decision makers need to grasp the context (or landscape) in which they operate and build political will around issues. Further, causes and potential solutions are identified (Galli, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%