“…It was seen that flexural and splitting tensile strengths of the experimental mix containing 75% bottom ash and 20% fly ash exceeded much more than the control sample. As can be seen from the previous studies, there are many studies on concrete performance using waste materials (Ghafoori and Bucholc, 1996;Topçu and Bilir, 2010a;Bilir, 2012;Singh and Siddique, 2013;Bilir, 2016;Lee et al, 2019;Karalar et al, 2022;Çelik et al, 2022;Qaidi et al, 2022;Aksoylu et al, 2022a) and other materials such as composite (Alam and Hussein, 2017;Truonga et al, 2017;Araba and Ashour, 2018;Bicer et al, 2018;Deng et al, 2018;Mahmood et al, 2018;Xu et al, 2018;Marvila et al, 2019;Azevedo et al, 2020;Wang et al, 2020;Azevedo et al, 2021;Özkılıç et al, 2021;Akın et al, 2022;Al-Rousan and Al-Muhiedat, 2022;Aksoylu et al, 2022b;Gemi et al, 2022;Huang et al, 2022;Lu et al, 2022;Tran et al, 2022;Özkılıç et al, 2022) in the literature. Researchers have identified differences in the properties of concrete, but few have discussed how the trade-offs of using a fine natural aggregate in place of a typical Portland cement (PC) mix.…”