2004
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1001858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Role of Retaliation in Trade Agreements

Abstract: This paper analyzes the role of retaliation in trade agreements. It shows that, in the presence of private information, retaliation can always be used to increase the welfare derived from such agreements by the participating governments. In particular, it is shown that retaliation is a necessary feature of any e¢ cient equilibrium.We argue that retaliation would not be necessary if governments could resort to international transfers or export subsidies to compensate for terms-of-trade externalities. Within the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…With this, there is an incentive to substitute tariffs with AD measures. Since tariffs are bound through the mutual agreement between member countries, the use of NTMs—such as AD—is then triggered (Martin and Vergote, ).…”
Section: A Simple Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this, there is an incentive to substitute tariffs with AD measures. Since tariffs are bound through the mutual agreement between member countries, the use of NTMs—such as AD—is then triggered (Martin and Vergote, ).…”
Section: A Simple Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Martin and Vergote (2008) do consider antidumping, however, in their paper it arises from private political pressure and the desire to temporarily renegotiate the agreement as allowed for in Article XXVIII. In this paper, we are more concerned with abuse of Article VI that arises from imperfect rather than incomplete information.…”
Section: A the Basic Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 30 The vector z(β) is detailed in the proof of Proposition 1 in the Appendix. Note that the assumption µ > Lemma 4.…”
Section: Contractual Rangementioning
confidence: 99%