2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12144-019-00509-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the role of vocal emotions in social decision-making

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be because distress cues are a powerful tool to elicit care, and being able to 'read' them could promote prosocial behaviours, such as helping a crying child [81]. Regarding vocal emotions, decreased cooperative behaviour was observed in adults towards partners displaying emotional prosody of anger, fear and disgust [82]. However, this was found in a study focused on decisions to cooperate in a social decision-making paradigm, and participants' ability to recognize emotional prosody was not examined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be because distress cues are a powerful tool to elicit care, and being able to 'read' them could promote prosocial behaviours, such as helping a crying child [81]. Regarding vocal emotions, decreased cooperative behaviour was observed in adults towards partners displaying emotional prosody of anger, fear and disgust [82]. However, this was found in a study focused on decisions to cooperate in a social decision-making paradigm, and participants' ability to recognize emotional prosody was not examined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been interpreted in terms of higher attractiveness eliciting expectations of other positive social qualities even before the interaction has occurred, which, in turn, increases trust in observers (Darai & Grätz, 2012; Davies, Goetz, & Shackelford, 2008; Mulford, Orbell, Shatto, & Stockard, 1998; Wilson & Eckel, 2006). Other studies have shown that displaying positive emotional expressions tends to improve interpersonal outcomes for the displayer while negative emotional expressions lead to poorer outcomes (Caballero & Menez, 2017, 2019; Hauser, Preston, & Stansfield, 2014; Krumhuber et al, 2007; Scharlemann, Eckel, Kacelnik, & Wilson, 2001; Tortosa, Strizhko, Capizzi, & Ruz, 2013, cf. Andrade & Ho, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allowed to control for other socially relevant information available in face-to-face encounters, such as facial characteristics and ethnicity, which can affect behavior in experimental games (Rezlescu et al, 2012; Todorov, 2008; Tortosa, Lupiáñez, et al, 2013), and therefore to attribute the observed effects to the manipulated variables (accent and confidence). While results of experiments involving repeated interactions (Caballero & Menez, 2017, 2019; Rezlescu et al, 2012; Romano, Balliet, Yamagishi, & Liu, 2017; Tortosa, Lupiáñez, et al, 2013; Tortosa, Strizhko, et al, 2013) often converge with those using one-shot and face-to-face methodologies (Krumhuber et al, 2007; Reed, Zeglen, & Schmidt, 2012), the second approach will be required to test whether result patterns change in one-shot situations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This could be because distress cues are a powerful tool to elicit care, and being able to 'read' them could promote prosocial behaviours, such as helping a child who is crying (Marsh, 2019). Regarding vocal emotions, decreased cooperative behaviour was observed in adults towards partners displaying emotional prosody of anger, fear and disgust (Caballero & Díaz, 2019). However, this was found in a study focused on decisions to cooperate in a social decision-making paradigm, and participants' ability to recognise emotional prosody was not examined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%