2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.laa.2019.10.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the rotational invariant L1-norm PCA

Abstract: Principal component analysis (PCA) is a powerful tool for dimensionality reduction. Unfortunately, it is sensitive to outliers, so that various robust PCA variants were proposed in the literature. One of the most frequently applied methods for high dimensional data reduction is the rotational invariant L 1 -norm PCA of Ding and coworkers. So far no convergence proof for this algorithm was available. The main topic of this paper is to fill this gap. We reinterpret this robust approach as a conditional gradient … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A proof can be found in [37,Thm. 6.1] along with an example which demonstrates the necessity of the Lipschitz continuity of f in the manifold setting in the first part of the theorem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A proof can be found in [37,Thm. 6.1] along with an example which demonstrates the necessity of the Lipschitz continuity of f in the manifold setting in the first part of the theorem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the Euclidean norm and h(x) = x 2 we get the classical PCA approach and for h(x) = x the robust rotationally invariant L 1 -norm PCA, recently discussed in [30,35].…”
Section: Example 63 Let Us Specify Two Special Cases Of Ppnns With One Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As future work, apart from the mathematical analysis of the EM algorithm with approximate M-step, we intend to work on the robustness of the method. This could be done by using a robust PCA [18], and also by making the model invariant to contrast changes, see, e.g. [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%