2018
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1804.02254
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the sample autocovariance of a Lévy driven moving average process when sampled at a renewal sequence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In many applications different sampling schemes are also highly relevant and for some special cases results have been obtained. For example, [14] considers the asymptotics of the autocovariance function for Lévy-driven moving average processes sampled at an independent renewal sequence and [26] consider the asymptotics of the pathwise Fourier transform/periodogram for Lévy-driven CARMA processes sampled at deterministic irregular grids. Considering independent renewal sampled Lévy-driven MMA processes is beyond the scope of the present paper and the content of future research just starting in [15] where the preservation of strong mixing and weak dependence properties is discussed in general.…”
Section: R)-measurable Function With Values Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many applications different sampling schemes are also highly relevant and for some special cases results have been obtained. For example, [14] considers the asymptotics of the autocovariance function for Lévy-driven moving average processes sampled at an independent renewal sequence and [26] consider the asymptotics of the pathwise Fourier transform/periodogram for Lévy-driven CARMA processes sampled at deterministic irregular grids. Considering independent renewal sampled Lévy-driven MMA processes is beyond the scope of the present paper and the content of future research just starting in [15] where the preservation of strong mixing and weak dependence properties is discussed in general.…”
Section: R)-measurable Function With Values Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It holds true that E 4 i=1 R d f i (t)dL(t) = (η − 3)σ 4 R d f 1 (u)f 2 (u)f 3 (u)f 4 (u)λ d (du) + σ d i=1,2 f i (u)λ d (du) R d i=3,4 f i (u)λ d (du) + σ d i=1,3 f i (u)λ d (du) R d i=2,4 f i (u)λ d (du) + σ i (u)λ d (du) R d i=2,3 f i (u)λ d (du).Proof. Follows directly from the proof of[3, Lemma 4.1]. Under the assumptions of Theorem 3.8, for ∆ p , ∆ q ∈ Z d , we have|Γ n |cov (γ * n (∆ p ), γ * n (∆ q )) → l∈Z d a l T l for n → ∞,whereT l :=(η − 3)σ 4 R d…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In [7], the asymptotics of the sample mean and sample autocovariance are studied when f decays sufficiently fast and L has finite second or fourth moment, respectively. [22] studies the situation when f decays slowly leading to a long-memory process X, while [11] considers the heavy tailed situation when the Lévy process L is in the domain of attraction of a stable non-normal distribution, and in [3] the case of random sampling when the process X is sampled at a renewal sequence is treated. Observe that all these results are in dimension d = 1 only.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As was the case in Theorem 1.1, statement (i) is more general than statement (ii) of Theorem 1.2, but the latter may be convenient as it gives conditions on the decay rate of ϕ 1 and ϕ 2 at infinity. In relation to Theorem 1.2, it should be mentioned that limit theorems for the sample autocovariances of moving average processes (1.5) have been studied in [5,10,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%