2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.09.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the scheduling of operations in a chat contact center

Abstract: Unlike calls, the chat channel allows a contact center agent to simultaneously work with many customers. The benefit of this flexibility can be however challenged by a new abandonment feature during service. In this context, new flow routing questions arise. How many chats should an agent serve? Which agent should be selected? Or may a chat be served by more than one agent? We aim to answer these questions so as to find the best trade-off between time spent in service, queueing delay and abandonment.For this p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(60 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This optimization can result in increased customer satisfaction and loyalty, ultimately leading to higher revenues for the business. Additional examples include [255,256].…”
Section: Service Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This optimization can result in increased customer satisfaction and loyalty, ultimately leading to higher revenues for the business. Additional examples include [255,256].…”
Section: Service Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In parallel, phone call data was used to automate and optimize other tasks including customer recognition [34], customer routing [17], adequately pairing customer and agent based on historical data [26] and evaluating the work carried out by agents [15]. In other types of channels data mining has been studied for instance in the context of chat routing modeling [20], emotion prediction from chats [28] and video chats [38].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intuitively, (10) implies that the departure rate due to completion of service by an agent working at the maximum level I should be higher than that for any other level. In fact, we show in Lemma EC.2 that if (10) does not hold, it is not optimal to use level I, under the assumption that our approximations are exact and we use a non-idling policy in the sense that agents continue accepting customers up to level I (see Legrosa and Jouinib (2018) for the case when this decision is made dynamically). Hence if (10) does not hold, it is optimal to have customers wait in queue instead of having them served by an agent at level I and we can restrict the maximum level to I − 1.…”
Section: Efficient and Inefficient Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%