2013
DOI: 10.1002/jgrc.20134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the seasonal freshwater stratification in the proximity of fast‐flowing tidewater outlet glaciers in a sub‐Arctic sill fjord

Abstract: [1] The Greenland Ice Sheet releases large amounts of freshwater into the fjords around Greenland and many fjords are in direct contact with the ice sheet through tidewater outlet glaciers. Here we present the first seasonal hydrographic observations from the inner part of a sub-Arctic fjord, relatively close to and within 4-50 km of a fast-flowing tidewater outlet glacier. This region is characterized by a dense glacial and sea ice cover. Freshwater from runoff, subglacial freshwater (SgFW) discharge, glacial… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

10
220
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(233 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
10
220
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of a fresh surface layer in the February profile means that the plume reaches the surface more easily, while use of the September profile produces only very minor differences relative to the default 5 August profile (Figs 7c-g). Observations by Mortensen and others (2013) suggest that the fresh surface layer is well established by late June and that the August profile is therefore likely representative of the stratification for much of the summer. In May and early June, it is possible that the fresh surface layer is absent (Mortensen and others, 2013); however, our modelling suggests that this makes it easier for a plume to reach the surface, thus lowering the critical discharge needed for the plume to reach the fjord surface and strengthening our conclusions regarding the distributed nature of subglacial discharge.…”
Section: Sensitivitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The lack of a fresh surface layer in the February profile means that the plume reaches the surface more easily, while use of the September profile produces only very minor differences relative to the default 5 August profile (Figs 7c-g). Observations by Mortensen and others (2013) suggest that the fresh surface layer is well established by late June and that the August profile is therefore likely representative of the stratification for much of the summer. In May and early June, it is possible that the fresh surface layer is absent (Mortensen and others, 2013); however, our modelling suggests that this makes it easier for a plume to reach the surface, thus lowering the critical discharge needed for the plume to reach the fjord surface and strengthening our conclusions regarding the distributed nature of subglacial discharge.…”
Section: Sensitivitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observations by Mortensen and others (2013) suggest that the fresh surface layer is well established by late June and that the August profile is therefore likely representative of the stratification for much of the summer. In May and early June, it is possible that the fresh surface layer is absent (Mortensen and others, 2013); however, our modelling suggests that this makes it easier for a plume to reach the surface, thus lowering the critical discharge needed for the plume to reach the fjord surface and strengthening our conclusions regarding the distributed nature of subglacial discharge. In summary, our analysis suggests that seasonal changes in stratification do not affect our conclusions.…”
Section: Sensitivitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To isolate which water body is driving subaqueous melt, we calculate the temperature and salinity loss due to the melting of glacier ice with reference to the Gade-slope (Gade, 1979;Holland and Jenkins, 1999;Mortensen et al, 2013;Straneo et al, 2011. Given a potential temperature for glacier ice (θ i ) at the front, we define an effective potential temperature (θ eff ) of the corresponding virtual water type by calculating the energy required to melt a unit weight of ice as follows:…”
Section: Identification Of Interaction Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%