2016
DOI: 10.1364/ol.41.005648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the sensitivity of distributed acoustic sensing

Abstract: In distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) an optical fiber is transformed into an array of thousands of "virtual microphones." Most current DAS methodologies are based on coherent interference of Rayleigh backscattered light and thus are prone to signal fading. Hence, the sensitivities of the "microphones" fluctuate randomly along the fiber. Therefore, specifying the sensitivity of DAS without considering its random nature is incomplete and of limited value. In this Letter, the statistical properties of DAS SNR an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
55
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A third type of optical noise manifests as a reduced amplitude pattern that is quasi‐random in space but time invariant. This common problem in phase‐sensitive Optical Time‐Domain Reflectometery measurements is called optical fading (Gabai & Eyal, ). Generally speaking, fading results from destructive interference, which can happen when the random electric fields from scatterers within the fiber sum to a very small total magnitude (Hecht, ).…”
Section: The Das Measurement Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A third type of optical noise manifests as a reduced amplitude pattern that is quasi‐random in space but time invariant. This common problem in phase‐sensitive Optical Time‐Domain Reflectometery measurements is called optical fading (Gabai & Eyal, ). Generally speaking, fading results from destructive interference, which can happen when the random electric fields from scatterers within the fiber sum to a very small total magnitude (Hecht, ).…”
Section: The Das Measurement Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparisons are performed between the mathematically reconstructed results of the FISTA and OMP methods and the experimental results obtained with f-OTDR conventional processing. The conventional processing of the f-OTDR raw-data is envelope detection to obtain the fiber profile and calculation of differential phase along the 'fast' time axis (namely, spatial phase difference) to obtain a linear measurement of the dynamic excitation signal of interest [38][39][40]. FISTA and OMP are mathematical methods which were developed to solve equations such as equation (2) for a sparse vector of unknowns.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is reasonable since the relative PSD at heterodyne frequency is the difference between the PSD at ∆ f and the noise floor. In Gabai's work [22], it has been found that the SNR of the demodulated phase was directly proportional to the SNR of the backscattered trace. According to Equation (2), the higher the noise floor, the lower the SNR of the demodulated phase, explaining the negative relation between the relative PSD at heterodyne frequency and the noise floor.…”
Section: Relation Between Psd and Noise Floormentioning
confidence: 97%