2018
DOI: 10.1090/bproc/32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the sharpness of the bound for the Local Converse Theorem of 𝑝-adic 𝐺𝐿_{π‘π‘Ÿπ‘–π‘šπ‘’}

Abstract: We introduce a novel ultrametric on the set of equivalence classes of cuspidal irreducible representations of a general linear group GL N over a non-archimedean local field, based on distinguishability by twisted gamma factors. In the case that N is prime and the residual characteristic is greater than or equal to N 2 , we prove that, for any natural number i ≀ N 2 , there are pairs of cuspidal irreducible representations whose logarithmic distance in this ultrametric is precisely βˆ’i. This implies that, under … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A natural question following Theorems 1.1, 1.2, and Corollary 1.3, is whether the bound ⌊ n 2 βŒ‹ is sharp. The sharpness of ⌊ n 2 βŒ‹ for the local converse theorem when A = C is proved in [ALST16] for the case of n being prime and p β‰₯ ⌊ n 2 βŒ‹. Thus, for β„“-adic families of co-Whittaker representations, we also expect the bound ⌊ n 2 βŒ‹ is sharp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…A natural question following Theorems 1.1, 1.2, and Corollary 1.3, is whether the bound ⌊ n 2 βŒ‹ is sharp. The sharpness of ⌊ n 2 βŒ‹ for the local converse theorem when A = C is proved in [ALST16] for the case of n being prime and p β‰₯ ⌊ n 2 βŒ‹. Thus, for β„“-adic families of co-Whittaker representations, we also expect the bound ⌊ n 2 βŒ‹ is sharp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…When n = 3, it is shown in [JPSS83] that t = 1 suffices, and Jacquet conjectured in 1999 that 1 t n 2 should suffice for arbitrary n. Jacquet's conjecture was proven in [Cha19] and [JL16], independently, for all n. We thus present Theorem 1.2 as a modanalogue of Jacquet's conjecture. It is shown in [ALST18] that the bound t n 2 cannot be improved in the K-setting.…”
Section: On the Mod-converse Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the sharpness of n 2 is not that obvious if we replace "generic" by "unitarizable supercuspidal" in the theorem. In the tame case, it is shown in [ALST18] that n 2 is indeed sharp for unitarizable supercuspidal representations of GL n (F ) when n is prime. For some certain families of supercuspidal representations, n 2 is no longer sharp and the GL 1 (F ) twisted Rankin-Selberg gamma factors might be enough to determine the structures of representations within these families.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%