2016
DOI: 10.1145/2904376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the significance of making in interaction design research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By extension, we call them nonidiomatic design situations. It has been shown that explorative conversations with design materials are conducive to innovative design also in non-idiomatic situations (Löwgren, 2016). It is clear that non-idiomatic design precludes sketching literacy and hence the sketch might have to more closely emulate the salient properties of the intended final artifact.…”
Section: Sketching Work In Idiomatic Situations With Sketching Literacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By extension, we call them nonidiomatic design situations. It has been shown that explorative conversations with design materials are conducive to innovative design also in non-idiomatic situations (Löwgren, 2016). It is clear that non-idiomatic design precludes sketching literacy and hence the sketch might have to more closely emulate the salient properties of the intended final artifact.…”
Section: Sketching Work In Idiomatic Situations With Sketching Literacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The creation of real designed objects is one of the goals of design research, and Lowgren [24] claims that making is required to effectively explore unknown interaction models -those for which there currently exist no idioms. Making is distinct from designing (an object) because it places emphasis on practical considerations, such as fabrication methods, functionality and, importantly, community involvement.…”
Section: Research Through Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This also explains why the practice of 'making' recently has found its way into a broad swathe of design literature. For instance, within the context of interaction design research Löwgren (2016) observes that there is a 'growing recognition that making is seen as important in interaction design research.' He also however notes it is 'less clear exactly how and why making is seen as important in interaction research.…”
Section: The Fablab As a Hybrid Hubmentioning
confidence: 99%