2016
DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2015.1041984
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the skewness of extreme order statistics from heterogeneous samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
6
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that Ding et al (2017) obtained the result in Theorem 3.6 for the special case of k = n under the multiple-outlier power-generalized Weibull model, which includes the multipleoutlier Weibull model as a special case.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Note that Ding et al (2017) obtained the result in Theorem 3.6 for the special case of k = n under the multiple-outlier power-generalized Weibull model, which includes the multipleoutlier Weibull model as a special case.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Further, Assumption 3.5 is equivalent to saying that th F (t) is increasing in t ∈ R + , and Assumption 3.6 is equivalent to saying that tr F (t) is decreasing in t ∈ R + . These simplified conditions are fulfilled by some well-known distributions within the scale family; see Ding et al (2017); Zhang et al (2019). (b) PHR family: In this case, we haveF(t; λ) = F λ (t), t ∈ R + .…”
Section: Corollary 32: Under the Setting Of Corollarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, they established star ordering for the proportional hazard rate model under some restrictions on parameters and presented results on Weibull and Pareto distributed samples. More recently, Ding et al [5] considered a scale model framework and examined the effect of heterogeneity on the skewness of the largest order statistics from such samples in the sense of star ordering. They proved that, without any restriction on the scale parameters, the skewness of the largest order statistics from heterogeneous samples is more than that from homogeneous samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%