1990
DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(90)90554-l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the stability of Au(110)-(1 × 2) and -(1 × 3) reconstructed surfaces in contact with an aqueous solution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been also reported that the surface contains a non-negligible number of defects even after hydrogen cooling [40]. Regarding the surface structure, previous studies by ex situ low-energy electron diffraction [41][42][43] have shown that the (1×2) Pt(l10) surface is stable in perchloric and sulfuric acid solution if the potential is restricted to potentials below 0.7 V. There is no previous report based on in situ techniques that shows the presence of the (1×2) reconstruction of the Pt(110) in an electrochemical environment. If there were a fast potential-induced reconstruction, the conclusions about the stability range for Pt(110) could be wrong (like for Au(110) [43]) because the (1×2) structure could be formed back from (1×1) at the immersion potential.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been also reported that the surface contains a non-negligible number of defects even after hydrogen cooling [40]. Regarding the surface structure, previous studies by ex situ low-energy electron diffraction [41][42][43] have shown that the (1×2) Pt(l10) surface is stable in perchloric and sulfuric acid solution if the potential is restricted to potentials below 0.7 V. There is no previous report based on in situ techniques that shows the presence of the (1×2) reconstruction of the Pt(110) in an electrochemical environment. If there were a fast potential-induced reconstruction, the conclusions about the stability range for Pt(110) could be wrong (like for Au(110) [43]) because the (1×2) structure could be formed back from (1×1) at the immersion potential.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32͒ or Ca adsorption. 33 Deeper corrugations than Au͑110͒-͑1 ϫ 3͒ have not been observed yet. 28 Also ͑1 ϫ 3͒ steps on Au͑110͒ can be stable up to temperatures as high as 500 K, as confirmed by high-temperature STM results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…on the preparation conditions Moritz and Wolf could also stabilize well ordered (1 x 3) MR-superstructures on Au(110) [6] and Pt(ll0) [24], although it seems that these phases possibly are stabilized by impurities [72,73].…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%